Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to critically assess two opposing theses about the epistemology of religious belief. The first one, developed by John Mackie, claims that belief in God can be justified or warranted only if there is a good argument for the existence of God. The second thesis, elaborated by Alvin Plantinga, holds that even if there is no such argument, belief in God can be justified or warranted. I contend that the first thesis is plausibly false, because belief in God is not just like a scientific hypothesis, and the second thesis is likely true if epistemic externalism is the correct view. However, even if the second thesis is true, I argue that to work on good arguments for God’s existence is unavoidable in order to cope with a new version of the Great Pumpkin objection, as well as to achieve other relevant purposes such as to convince rational observers outside the theistic community that belief in God is likely justified or warranted.

Authors and Affiliations

Domingos Faria

Keywords

Related Articles

On a productive dialogue between religion and science

Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pra...

What makes us human? Augustine on interiority, exteriority and the self

The composition of the human person is a central issue for Augustine. He addresses it in a philosophico-theological way; particularly in The Soliloquies and in The Confessions. What is at stake here is his exposition of...

Il constante progredire della frontiera tra teologia e scienza. Parte 2º: Metafisica

On constant movement of frontiers between Science and Theology. Part 2: Metaphysics In the first part (Karwasz, Scientia et Fides, 3(1) 2015) entitled “Physics” we showed how discoveries of modern sciences do not contra...

Si può parlare di Dio nel contesto della scienza contemporanea?

Is it possible to speak about God in the context of contemporary science? The question of God, neglected in the philosophy of the twentieth century, emerges unexpectedly in contemporary science. However, the access to t...

Die Frage nach dem Handeln Gottes in der Welt als elementares Glaubensproblem

The Question of God´s Action in the World as one Fundamental Aspect of Crisis of Faith Christian religion is mainly based on the fact of God´s action in the world, as the Holy Bible expresses and testifies in many diffe...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP195145
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.006
  • Views 85
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Domingos Faria (2016). Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments. Scientia et Fides, 4(1), 77-100. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-195145