Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments

Journal Title: Scientia et Fides - Year 2016, Vol 4, Issue 1

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to critically assess two opposing theses about the epistemology of religious belief. The first one, developed by John Mackie, claims that belief in God can be justified or warranted only if there is a good argument for the existence of God. The second thesis, elaborated by Alvin Plantinga, holds that even if there is no such argument, belief in God can be justified or warranted. I contend that the first thesis is plausibly false, because belief in God is not just like a scientific hypothesis, and the second thesis is likely true if epistemic externalism is the correct view. However, even if the second thesis is true, I argue that to work on good arguments for God’s existence is unavoidable in order to cope with a new version of the Great Pumpkin objection, as well as to achieve other relevant purposes such as to convince rational observers outside the theistic community that belief in God is likely justified or warranted.

Authors and Affiliations

Domingos Faria

Keywords

Related Articles

Mariano Artigas (1938—2006) Testimonio de unos encuentros y breves reflexiones sobre el Grupo de Investigación Ciencia, Razón y Fe (CRYF) de la Universidad de Navarra

Mariano Artigas (1938–2006). Testimony of some meetings and brief reflections on the Research Group Science, Reason and Faith (CRYF) of the University of Navarra This contribution is aimed to emphasise the author’s pers...

Die Frage nach dem Handeln Gottes in der Welt als elementares Glaubensproblem

The Question of God´s Action in the World as one Fundamental Aspect of Crisis of Faith Christian religion is mainly based on the fact of God´s action in the world, as the Holy Bible expresses and testifies in many diffe...

Los tratados médicos renacentistas en la gnoseología de Francisco Suárez

Renaissance medical treatises in the psychology of Francisco Suarez Spanish Renaissance physicians, especially Francis Valles, are a major source of inspiration for Suarez's commentary to De anima. This paper analyzes t...

La crítica de Juan de santo Tomás del concepto suareciano de materia prima

The John of Saint Thomas' critique of the suarecian concept of the prime matter The figure of Juan Poinsot (Juan de Santo Tomás, Joannis a Santo Thoma) is inserted in the movement of return to a Thomism free of nominali...

The Significance of Being Ethical: An essay on the case for moral realism and theism

William Irwin defends a form of moral anti-realism, according to which there are no objective moral facts. He contends that moral realism is objectionable because of its being more complex or not as simple as anti-realis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP195145
  • DOI 10.12775/SetF.2016.006
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Domingos Faria (2016). Mackie vs Plantinga on the warrant of theistic belief without arguments. Scientia et Fides, 4(1), 77-100. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-195145