Measuring the relative contributions of rule-based and exemplar-based processes in judgment: Validation of a simple model
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 5
Abstract
Judgments and decisions can rely on rules to integrate cue information or on the retrieval of similar exemplars from memory. Research on exemplar-based processes in judgment has discovered several task variables influencing the dominant mode of processing. This research often aggregates data across participants or classifies them as using either exemplar-based or cue-based processing. It has been argued for theoretical and empirical reasons that both kinds of processes might operate together or in parallel. Hence, a classification of strategies may be a severe oversimplification that also sacrifices statistical power to detect task effects. We present a simple measurement tool combining both processing modes. The simple model contains a mixture parameter quantifying the relative contribution of both kinds of processes in a judgment and decision task. In three experiments, we validate the measurement model by demonstrating that instructions and task variables affect the mixture parameter in predictable ways, both in memory-based and screen-based judgments.
Authors and Affiliations
Arndt Bröder, Michael Gräf and Pascal J. Kieslich
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678310
- DOI -
- Views 192
- Downloads 0
How decision context changes the balance between cost and benefit increasing charitable donations
Recent research on charitable donations shows that donors evaluate both the impact of helping and its cost. We asked whether these evaluations were affected by the context of alternative charitable causes. We found that...
An item response theory and factor analytic examination of two prominent maximizing tendency scales
The current study examines the construct validity of the Maximization Scale (MS; Schwartz et al., 2002) and the Maximization Tendency Scale (MTS; Diab et al., 2008) as well as the nomological net of the maximizing constr...
The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences
The impact of default options on choice is a reliable, well-established behavioral finding. However, several different effects may lend to choosing defaults in an often indistinguishable manner, including loss aversion,...
The motivated use of moral principles
Five studies demonstrated that people selectively use general moral principles to rationalize preferred moral conclusions. In Studies 1a and 1b, college students and community respondents were presented with variations o...
Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience
When deciding for others based on explicitly described odds and outcomes, people often have different risk preferences for others than for themselves. In two pre-registered experiments, we examine risk preference for oth...