When your anchor sinks your boat: Information asymmetry in distributive negotiations and the disadvantage of making the first offer

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 5

Abstract

The literature on behavioral decision-making and negotiations to date usually advocates first-mover advantage in distributive negotiations, and bases this preference on the anchoring heuristic. In the following paper, we suggest that the preference for moving first vs. moving second in negotiations may not be as clear-cut as presumed, especially in situations characterized by information asymmetry between negotiating counterparts. In Study 1, we examined people’s initiation preferences and found that unless taught otherwise, people intuitively often prefer to move second. In Studies 2–4, we experimentally tested the suggested advantage of moving second, and demonstrated that in information-asymmetry scenarios – when one party has perfect background information and the other has none — it is actually preferable for both counterparts not to give the first offer while negotiating. We discuss the implications of our findings on the field of negotiation and decision-making, and lay the groundwork for future studies examining this issue.

Authors and Affiliations

Yossi Maaravi and Aharon Levy

Keywords

Related Articles

Incentives in religious performance: a stochastic dominance approach

Using a stochastic dominance approach in an international dataset of about 10,000 Catholic subjects, we show that incentives (based on absolute belief) play a crucial role in religious practice (church attendance and pra...

When a risky prospect is valued more than its best possible outcome

In this paper, we document a violation of normative and descriptive models of decision making under risk. In contrast to uncertainty effects found by Gneezy, List and Wu (2006), some subjects in our experiments valued lo...

The link between intuitive thinking and social conservatism is stronger in WEIRD societies

While previous studies reveal mixed findings on the relationship between analytic cognitive style (ACS) and right-wing (conservative) political orientation, the correlation is generally negative. However, most of these s...

Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?

Genetic screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 gives women the opportunity for early detection, surveillance, and intervention. One key feature of genetic testing and counseling is the provision of personal lifetime risk. However...

What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis

We used a diffusion model to examine the effects of response-bias manipulations on response time (RT) and accuracy data collected in two experiments involving a two-choice decision making task. We asked 18 subjects to re...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678305
  • DOI -
  • Views 179
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Yossi Maaravi and Aharon Levy (2017). When your anchor sinks your boat: Information asymmetry in distributive negotiations and the disadvantage of making the first offer. Judgment and Decision Making, 12(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678305