Mechanism of synergistic action following co-treatment with pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline in the forced swimming test in rats.

Journal Title: Pharmacological Reports - Year 2006, Vol 58, Issue 4

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of combined treatment of male Wistar rats with pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline in the forced swimming test. The obtained results showed that co-treatment with pramipexole (0.1 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) or sertraline (5 mg/kg) (in doses inactive per se) exhibited antidepressant-like activity in the forced swimming test. Sulpiride (a dopamine D(2/3) receptor antagonist) and WAY 100635 (a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist), either being ineffective in the forced swimming test, inhibited the antidepressant-like effect induced by co-administration of pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline. However, SCH 23390 (a dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist) only partly did not alter the effect of pramipexole given jointly with antidepressant drugs; on the other hand, S 33084 (a dopamine D(3) receptor antagonist) only partly decreased (in a statistically insignificant manner) that effect. Moreover, progesterone and BD 1047 (a sigma(1) receptor antagonist) counteracted the antidepressant-like effect induced by co-administration of pramipexole and sertraline (but not pramipexole and fluoxetine). In that test, active behavior did not reflect the increases in general activity, since combined administration of pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline failed to enhance the locomotor activity of rats. None of the tested drugs (SCH 23390, sulpiride, S 33084, WAY 100635, BD 1047 and progesterone) - alone or in combination with pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline - changed locomotor activity. The results described in the present paper indicate that co-administration of pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline may induce a more pronounced antidepressive activity than does treatment with pramipexole alone, and that in addition to other mechanisms, dopamine D(2/3) and 5-HT(1A) receptors may contribute to the antidepressant-like activity of pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline in the forced swimming test in rats. Moreover, sigma(1) receptors may constitute one of the possible mechanisms by which co-administration of pramipexole and sertraline induces antidepressant-like activity in that test.

Authors and Affiliations

Zofia Rogóż, Grażyna Skuza

Keywords

Related Articles

Locomotor activity changes in female adolescent and adult rats during repeated treatment with a cannabinoid or club drug.

Adolescents and young adults of both sexes are the primary consumers of "club" drugs; yet, most of the mechanistic preclinical research in this area has been performed in adult male rodents. The purpose of this study was...

Effect of licofelone against mechanical hyperalgesia and cold allodynia inthe rat model of incisional pain.

Hyperalgesia from an incisional pain is evoked by noxious stimuli (mechanicaland cold). The present study was aimed to examine the effect of licofelone, a dual inhibitor of cyclooxygenases(COX-1/COX-2) and 5-lipoxygenase...

Neuroprotective effects of MTEP, a selective mGluR5 antagonists and neuropeptide Y on the kainate-induced toxicity in primary neuronal cultures.

The majority of studies on neuroprotection tested potentially protective compounds given before, simultaneously or shortly after damage. Such procedures are greatly different from the situation faced in clinical practice...

Inhibitory effect of antidepressants on B16F10 melanoma tumor growth.

Background: Antidepressant drugs, like fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, desipramine, a nonselective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and mirtazapine, an antagonist of noradrenaline α2 auto- and hete...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP82407
  • DOI -
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Zofia Rogóż, Grażyna Skuza (2006). Mechanism of synergistic action following co-treatment with pramipexole and fluoxetine or sertraline in the forced swimming test in rats.. Pharmacological Reports, 58(4), 493-500. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-82407