METAPHORIC REPRESENTATION OF EMOTION CONCEPT OF ANGER (BASED ON LOREN OLIVER’S NOVELS DELIRIUM, PANDEMONIUM, REQUIEM)

Abstract

The article deals with the study of the emotion concept of ANGER, explicated in Loren Oliver’s dystopian novels Delirium, Pandemonium, Requiem by means of conceptual metaphors. The study distinguishes the conventional ontological and structural conceptual metaphors for the objectifying of the concept of ANGER, among which are EMOTIONS ARE SUBSTANCES (within a person), PERSON IS A CONTAINER (for emotions), EMOTIONS ARE LIQUIDS, ANGER IS HEAT, ANGER IS A LIVING BEING, ANGER IS A PERSON, ANGER IS LIQUID, EFFECT ON EMOTIONAL SELF IS CONTACT WITH PHYSICAL SELF, EMOTIONS ARE (ELECTROMAGNETIC) FORCES. The article describes the creative author’s metaphors that objectify the concept, namely ANGER IS A WORM, ANGER IS SEA, ANGER IS FIRE, ANGER IS A (SHARP) OBJECT. It has been revealed that the formation of the author’s poetic images of the emotion of anger is based mostly on conventional conceptual metaphors. In the process of the analysis, the formation of the author’s poetic images to denote anger has been traced through cognitive mechanisms of rethinking of conventional metaphors, such as elaboration, extension, combination. It has been found out that the cognitive mechanism of combining is the most frequent means of formation of the author’s poetic images, since the artistic rethinking of conventional metaphors is a complex cognitive process. The formation of creative, author's conceptual metaphors, in most cases, is achieved by the author by means of the elaboration of conventional structural or ontological metaphors to denote the emotion of anger (EMOTIONS ARE LIQUIDS → ANGER IS LIQUID, NATURAL PHENOMENON IS A PERSON → FOG IS A PERSON, EMOTIONS ARE ENTITIES (within a person) → ANGER IS A (SHARP) OBJECT, PERSON IS A CONTAINER (for emotions) → EYES ARE CONTAINERS FOR ANGER), as well as by elaboration of the source domain (EMOTIONS ARE LIQUID → ANGER IS LIQUID → ANGER IS FOG, EMOTIONS ARE LIQUIDS → ANGER IS LIQUID → ANGER IS THE SEA, EMOTIONS ARE (ELECTROMAGNETIC) FORCES → ANGER IS ELECTRICITY, ANGER IS A LIVING BEING ANGER IS AN ANAL ANGER IS A WORM).

Authors and Affiliations

Христина Тарасівна Павлюк

Keywords

Related Articles

Current issues of translation of terms in biogas production.

The article is devoted to biogas production as one of the effective means of renewable energy usage. Unlike the countries of European Union, where the number of biogas plants is measured in thousands, the production of b...

Comparative Phraseological Units in English-Ukrainian Translation of Fiction.

Comparisons are widely used in literary works of many authors, thus constituting an exceptional flavor of a literary work. The article aims to highlight procedures, techniques, methods, strategies and tactics that prove...

NOMINATION AND SYMBOLISM OF MATERIAL CULTURE OBJECTS IN THE PHRASEOLOGICAL AND PROVERBIC CONTEXT

The author gives the semantic analysis of the real culture code dominated by the principles of anthropocentrism, community- centeredness and onomasiological basis selectivity. The material used for the study are the dict...

Phraseological innovations and new formations of the modern English language.

The article highlights the principles of creation and functioning of phraseological units of modern English. Special attention is drawn to the areas of origin and peculiarities of the development of phraseological innova...

Speech acts of agreement / disagreement in English business-discourse: functional and structural specifics.

The article focuses on the problem of functional and structural peculiarities of the agreement and disagreement speech act in English dialogical business-discourse. The author argues that these speech acts are closely co...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP500422
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Христина Тарасівна Павлюк (2018). METAPHORIC REPRESENTATION OF EMOTION CONCEPT OF ANGER (BASED ON LOREN OLIVER’S NOVELS DELIRIUM, PANDEMONIUM, REQUIEM). Львівський філологічний часопис, 4(), 79-83. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-500422