Miasta, manekiny i maszyny metafizyczne
Journal Title: Schulz/Forum - Year 2015, Vol 5, Issue 5
Abstract
The French critic reveals a whole extensive network of affinities which connect Schulz’s oneiric fiction with that of Alfred Kubin, E.T.A. Hoffmann, Max Blecher, and – perhaps not surprisingly – Franz Kafka. Selecting from the world of Schulz three specific motifs: the city, the mannequin, and the metaphysical machine, he demonstrates that the writer from Drogobych joined, for the most part unawares, the mainstream of European modernism both in its literary and artistic varieties, including the self-reflexive art of Marcel Duchamp.
Authors and Affiliations
Serge Fauchereau
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP169847
- DOI -
- Views 28
- Downloads 0
Bruno Schulz jako krytyk – figury wyobraźni
Bruno Schulz used in his critical essays metaphors and imagery which created a uniquely organized world. Its elements and their arrangement, just as those of his stories, always have some value and exist in time, which m...
Filatelistyczne inklinacje Brunona Schulza i Waltera Benjamina
In Schulz’s short story “Spring” the interest in stamps and a stamp album, which plays the role of a quasi-mystical Book, equals fascination with distant, exotic realms located outside the familiar. It is also a praise o...
„Tajemnica pozostała jeszcze w głębi serc…”. O zwierzętach i wyobraźni Brunona Schulza
In his stories, Bruno Schulz told the history of animals or, rather, animalized humans or humanized animals. He multiplied similarities and differences, inquiring about the nature of their origin. His artistic imaginatio...
Ukryci świadkowie, czyli co pozostało (w książce Ficowskiego i w realnym świecie) po dwóch kolegach Brunona Schulza
Among the earliest witnesses of Bruno Schulz’s life known by Jerzy Ficowski were two lawyers from Drohobych, Michał Chajes and Izydor Friedman (after the war Tadeusz Lubowiecki). Although they played a particularly large...
Dorożka w lesie – Schulz i pisanie
This paper treats Bruno Schulz’s Cinnamon Shops as a depiction of two entirely different models of writing: the first disturbingly real for Schulz, and the second more idealized, or even nostalgic. The first model presen...