МІЖДИСЦИПЛІНАРНІ ІНТЕРПРЕТАЦІЇ ФЕНОМЕНА СОЦІАЛЬНОЇ ВІДПОВІДАЛЬНОСТІ
Journal Title: Гуманітарний часопис - Year 2016, Vol 1, Issue 3
Abstract
Bairachnyi Vadym INTERDISCIPLINARY INTERPRETATIONS OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PHENOMENON At the present stage of human civilization development the scientific activity sphere is constantly expanding, and the impact of science on society is growing steadily. This process promotes new ways of interaction within science, leading to the emergence of such scientific knowledge forms as interdisciplinary studies. In our view the concept of “interdisciplinary research” should be understood as results of research, aimed at complex study of some elaborately organized system object based on generalization of subject knowledge which belongs to the related fields of science as well as knowledge at the intersection of various sciences, according to the principle of complementarity and synthesis at the philosophical-methodological level. Referring to the philosophical and methodological aspects of interdisciplinary research, it should be noted that there remains that very leading methodology relying on the laws of dialectics formulated and developed in dialectical-materialist philosophy by Hegel. Particularly in this study we rely on systematic analysis of social responsibility category that is investigated by means of the following methodological principles: the principle of integrity; the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of semantic position harmonization. The category of "responsibility" is considered by many sciences during all the stages of evolution of social relations development. Therefore, it is obvious that its analysis is outlined by such fields of science as philosophy, ethics, sociology, psychology, political science, law and economics, and requires an interdisciplinary approach. Considering an interdisciplinary analysis of social responsibility as a system, the author concludes: 1. Social responsibility is a complex entity that forms a system, which is a prerequisite for interaction between the individual and society. As the activity principle, it acts as requirement, purpose and the activity process of an individual in the same time, which in turn must be coordinated with the needs and purposes of society. 2. It allows identifying the determinants of individual behavior and individual choice of their social role and socially active position in society. 3. The social responsibility system is characterized by dynamics of its structural elements: subject – object – instance that while functioning can be transformed and replace each other. The effectiveness of this system operation is determined by the level of society development and social qualities of subjects − social responsibility carriers. 4. The social responsibility system is shown in the interaction between the individual and society, including: - Responsibility is inherent in human, though not by nature, but as a result of influence of certain social conditions on a specific person; - Responsibility is a socio-cultural quality of the individual that is directly related to the volitional commitment of individual, reflected in his social activity implementation within a particular society; - Responsibility stands as mechanism of social control, regulation of socio-public relations of the individual and society, and social basis of society. Thus, in our view the formation of interdisciplinary research areas should be considered as a new type of scientific revolutions that has recently emerged and has not received a thorough philosophical analysis yet, which is characteristic to the current stage of scientific knowledge development and philosophy of science. It is the interdisciplinary approach that provides an opportunity to consider the concept of social responsibility as a system. The integrity of social responsibility as the system is its starting point. With many interrelated elements, the system of social responsibility is a qualitatively new integrated phenomenon whose properties are not reduced to the properties of its individual units or their total. Social responsibility as a unit is a dialectical unity of objective and subjective, internal and external parts that are studied by the various branches of human knowledge supplementing and enriching one another.
Authors and Affiliations
Вадим Байрачний
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP566005
- DOI -
- Views 190
- Downloads 0
ПОТЕНЦІАЛ І МЕЖІ ФІЛОСОФСЬКОЇ АНТРОПОЛОГІЇ ЯК МЕТОДОЛОГІЇ ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ МНОЖИННОЇ ІДЕНТИЧНОСТІ ОСОБИСТОСТІ
Zoya Shevchenko POTENTIAL AND LIMITS OF PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY AS A METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE IDENTITY OF PERSONALITY Philosophical anthropology proceeds from understanding the essence of man as a fun...
САКРАЛІЗАЦІЯ Й РИТУАЛІЗАЦІЯ КОРПОРАТИВНОЇ КУЛЬТУРИ
Mariya Y. Dmytrenko SACRALIZATION AND RITUALIZATION OF CORPORATE CULTURE The article touches upon the problem of sacralisation and ritualization of corporate culture. The author stresses that corporate culture has cu...
СТУДЕНЧЕСКАЯ РЕФЛЕКСИЯ ПОВЕДЕНИЯ АБИТУРИЕНТА (КТО, КАК И ПОЧЕМУ ВЫБИРАЕТ ТЕХНИЧЕСКИЙ ВУЗ)
Kopylov V.A., Lobanova L. A. THE CHOICE OF THE STRATEGY OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION (APPLICANT ON THE VERGE OF KHAI – GRADUATE ON THE VERGE OF EMPLOYMENT). The problem of choosing a strategy of technical education at th...
АКТУАЛЬНІ ПРОБЛЕМИ ПРИКЛАДНОЇ ЛЕКСИКОГРАФІЇ: СПЕЦИФІКА УКЛАДАННЯ ДРУКОВАНИХ ТЕРМІНОЛОГІЧНИХ СЛОВНИКІВ ВУЗЬКОЇ СПЕЦІАЛІЗАЦІЇ (ГАЛУЗЬ АВІАЦІЙНОГО ДВИГУНОБУДУВАННЯ)
Ryzhkova Victoriia, Velychko Ann TOPICAL ISSUES OF APPLIED LEXICOGRAPHY: SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF COMPILING PRINTED FIELD-SPECIFIC DICTIONARIES OF TECHNICAL TERMS (AVIATION ENGINE-BUILDING) The paper concerns specific a...
КУЛЬТОВА АРХІТЕКТОНІКА ЯК СТРИЖНЕВИЙ ЕЛЕМЕНТ РИТУАЛІЗАЦІЇ В ГЕОПРОСТОРІ ХРИСТИЯНСТВА: КУЛЬТУРОЛОГІЧНО-ФІЛОСОФСЬКА ТРАНСКРИПЦІЯ
Maksym Melnychuk CULT ARCHITECTONICS AS THE CORE ELEMENT OF RITUALIZATION IN THE GEOSPACE OF CHRISTIANITY: CULTUROLOGICAL-PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSCRIPTION In this scientific study, multifunctionality of religious buildi...