Modificarea acuzării în şedinţa de judecată în sensul agravării ei. probleme de drept procesual-penal
Journal Title: Revista Națională de Drept - Year 2017, Vol 9, Issue 203
Abstract
The study is based on the author’s explanation of the modification of charging in the meaning of its aggravation; explanations based on logical and legal reasoning; literal and systemic interpretation of the legal provisions. The article sets out the modalities, conditions and cases when there can be operated the modifications of the charge (in the sense of its aggravation) under the par. (1) and (2) of art.326 CCP. There are also exemplified classifications of the factual circumstances, related to the cases (situations) provided by the legislator in the legal text of art.326 CPP, as well as answers to several questions fixed for research purposes. Ab initio, from the prospective of the author’s opinion, there are explained notions used by the legislator in the legal text of art.326 CCP, and expressed answers to the following questions: 1) What is the meaning of “more serious crime than the one previously incriminated” in the context of paragraph (1) of the nominated article? 2) How should we appreciate the legal text - “the time required to prepare the defense for the new accusation”. 3) How to perceive the phrase - “another criminal offense” in the context of par. (2) article 326 CCP ? 4) What are the particularities of the “new circumstances” that are capable to influence the legal classification of the accusation brought against the defendant? 4) What are the peculiarities and circumstances of the offense committed in co-participation? 5) What does the unjustified or unlawful removal from criminal prosecution mean? The delimitation of the concepts: unjustified removal and unlawful removal from criminal prosecution;
Subiectul infracțiunilor prevăzute la art.241 din codul penal
The purpose of this article is to examine the features that characterize the subject of the offences specified at art.241 PC RM. It is concluded that the offences in question cannot be perpetrated by a legal person if: 1...
Administrarea probelor prin interceptarea de comunicări electronice în probatoriul penal
Whether it’s performed by a cell phone or by any other device, the electronic communication is of utmost importance for the criminal justice system. The conversations made by these specific technical means bear various k...
Latura subiectivă a infracțiunilor prevăzute la art.241 din Codul penal
This study is focused on the analysis of the subjective side of the offences set forth in art.241 PC RM. It is argued that any indirect intention or recklessness (resulting in overconfidence or negligence) cannot form th...
Originea contractului de vânzare-cumpărare comercial
The contract of sale which actually represents the exponent of civil contracts can be analyzed as a commercial contract, which can be found not only a varied but as an autonomous institution. Knowing its evolution and or...
Tendințe jurisprudențiale privind stabilirea cuantumului proporțiilor mici în cazurile de sustragere a bunurilor
In the present article it is stressed out that through Law nr.207/2016 the legislator failed to show consistency when establishing the quantum of the conventional unit. Only alin.(2) art.64 of the Criminal Code of Republ...