Mołdawia: postanowienie Sądu Konstytucyjnego nr 5 z dnia 2 marca 2016 r. w sprawie wykładni art. 106/1 ust. 1 Konstytucji Republiki Mołdawii (przyjęcie przez rząd odpowiedzialności za ustawę)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 147, Issue 4
Abstract
One of the mechanisms of strengthening the government in the legislative process in Moldova is contained in Article 106/1 para. 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova. In accordance therewith, the government may assume responsibility before the parliament for the realization of a specifi c program, policy direction or the demand for a bill to be passed. The government is recalled if a motion for a vote of no confi dence, submitted within three days from the presentation of the program, a general policy direction or a bill, is passed according to the procedure specifi ed in Article 106 of the Constitution. If the government is not recalled, the submitted bill is considered accepted, and the program of general policy direction becomes binding for the government. A constitutional problem arose against the discussed provision, related to the possibility of the simultaneous assumption of responsibility by the government for several bills, if it is justifi ed with the need for urgent proceedings. In its judgment no. 5 of 2 March 2016, the Constitutional Court decided that the government may assume responsibility for several bills, however, this shall be considered an exceptional case, justifi ed with the urgent need or necessity to introduce solutions contained in those bills; moreover, the legislative acts must refer to the same matter. In this case the President of Moldova may not exercise his right to return the bill to the parliament for reconsideration. He may, however, refer it to the Constitutional Court to examine its conformity to the Constitution.
Authors and Affiliations
Andrzej Pogłodek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP407482
- DOI 10.31268/PS.2018.12
- Views 28
- Downloads 0
Problem aborcji w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Na podstawie wyroku z 26 maja 2011 r. w sprawie R.R. versus Polska
The termination of pregnancy is a complex issue in the legal, ethical, moral and religious dimensions. The author briefl y discusses the circumstances of the adoption in 1993 of a „compromise” Bill on Family Planning, Hu...
Skarga na przewlekłość postępowania sądowego z perspektywy standardów konstytucyjnego prawa do sądu
The excessive length of judicial and administrative proceedings is not rare in our country. The legislature, bound especially by the requirements of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freed...
Między autonomią a państwowością. Próby instytucjonalizacji struktur przedstawicielskich i wykonawczych w Ukrainie po I wojnie światowej
One of the elements of constructing the Ukrainian statehood after the First World War was the establishment of representative and executive structures. First institutions — organs of authority were founded in Trans-Dnies...
Kontrasygnata decyzji prezydenta w Republice Czeskiej
The article presents an institution of countersignature in the Czech Republic. In view of the clear link to the structures existing in the past, its evolution is also shown, starting with the Constitution of 1920. Initia...
W sprawie problematyki prawa do informacji publicznej w kontekście przepisów rozporządzenia o ochronie danych osobowych
The opinion refers to the issue of the right to public information in the context of the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The opinion was prepared in connection with the state in which the pub...