Mołdawia: Postanowienie Sądu Konstytucyjnego z 20 stycznia 2015 r. nr 2 o wykładni art. 1 ust. 3 w związku z art. 69 i 70 Konstytucji Republiki Mołdawii (immunitet i wygaśnięcie mandatu deputowanego)
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2019, Vol 151, Issue 2
Abstract
Judgment no. 2 of the Constitutional Court of Moldova of 20 January 2015 refers to the issue of parliamentary immunity and the cases of termination of a mandate of a member of Parliament as foreseen by the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova. The Constitutional Court laid down the scope interpretation of Articles 69 and 70 of the Constitution, adjudicating that a Deputy sentenced with a valid court judgment does not enjoy the privilege of parliamentary immunity. Also, the privilege is not applied where a national court recognizes a sentence passed by a court of a foreign state. A person sentenced with a valid court judgment for a crime committed with intention or sentenced to a prison term loses its right to be elected, hence cannot be legitimately elected to the Parliament. He/she also loses his/her mandate ex lege after the judgment had been passed.
Authors and Affiliations
Andrzej Pogłódek
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP563205
- DOI 10.31268/PS.2019.33
- Views 37
- Downloads 0
Realizacja prawa petycji przez Sejm VIII kadencji (lata 2015–2018). Wybrane zagadnienia
The article contains an analysis of the hitherto realisation of the constitutional right of petition by the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. With the entry into force of the Act of 11 July 2014 on petitions, public author...
Uprawnienia organów władzy wykonawczej w zakresie zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa państwa
State security and related issues are becoming increasingly important in the modern world. In this case, an interesting issue is to analyze it from the perspective of Constitution of Poland of 2 April 1997. The powers of...
Pierwsze pięć lat działalności Sądu Najwyższego Zjednoczonego Królestwa Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej
In October of 2009 the first five years of the functioning of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland passed. The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in the UK for civil cases...
Na temat Drittwirkung w Niemczech. Odpowiedź na polemikę Bartosza Skwary
The article is a reply to polemic comments from Bartosz Skwara (“Sejm Review” 2017, no. 1) to my article Horyzontalne działanie praw podstawowych w Niemczech, [w:] Oddziaływanie współczesnych konstytucji na stosunki międ...
Uwagi Maurycego Zdzisława Jaroszyńskiego o ustroju Polski po śmierci marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego
The study recalls an unknown statement by Maurycy Jaroszyński from the time of the war, containing an analysis of the government of 1926–1939. This opinion is critical, and its justification shows the incompatibility of...