Impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the hhohho region of swaziland.

Journal Title: Scientia Agriculturae - Year 2016, Vol 14, Issue 1

Abstract

 Maize production on Swazi Nation Land (SNL) accounts for only 10% of total agricultural output in Swaziland. Although, almost all households in SNL produce maize, the country has never reached self-sufficient levels in maize production. Many farmers put the blame on the decline in rainfall, lower maize prices, and high input prices among others. The main objective of this study was therefore to assess the impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the Hhohho region of Swaziland. The Hhohho region has many sustainable water schemes than the other regions and it has the most favourable climatic conditions for maize production. To achieve this objective, primary data was collected from two groups of farmers (beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the schemes). Profitability and the factors affecting participation were analysed through the farm budgetary and Logit regression analysis respectively while Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to examine the impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the area of study. Results showed that although farmers in the scheme incurred a more variable costs than those not in the scheme but they still make about trice the profit made by those not in the scheme. The relatively low profit by the farmers not in the scheme was largely attributed to the 76.8% of their total cost spent on fixed assets which significantly affect their profit level. Family size and family labour as well as irrigation and type of farming practice significantly affect participation in the water scheme. The water scheme had a positive impact on maize and the least a farmer could receive under the rural water scheme for maize cultivation is E2351.71. There is also a spillover effect of the water schemes on the non-beneficiary group by E1530.06 which means the intervention of water schemes might increase the non-beneficiaries output as well.

Authors and Affiliations

M. O Raufu , I. O Oyewo , M. D Abdurrasheed

Keywords

Related Articles

 Potentials and uses of Fish products and other aquatic animals

 Fish and other aquatic animal products do not only provide essential nutrients for the body but of several uses. Fish and other aquatic organisms are also processed into various food and non-food products. The fles...

 Diversity of leafy vegetables and its significance to rural households of Bhadrak district, Odisha, India

 An ethnobotanical investigation was performed to collect, identify and document information on the wild green leafy vegetables traditionally used by the people in the interior pockets of Bhadrak district, Odisha, I...

 Genetics of grain yield and quality characteristics of wheat parents and their F2 progenies as affected by low level of N fertilization

 Information on the type of gene action controlling the expression of inheritance of wheat grain yield and quality traits under low-N conditions are prerequisite for starting an effective breeding program in Egypt f...

 Changes in Chemical Composition during Germination of Some Canola Varieties Changes in oil content and fatty acid composition

 This work has been carried out to investigate the changes that occur in oil content of eight varieties of canola seeds under the effect of soaking and germinations as well as changes in fatty acid composition of lo...

 Yam Yield Variations From Three-Year Continuous Cultivation Under Sole And Mixed Cropping Systems In An Alfisol Of Eastern Nigeria

 Sole Yam (SY) and Yam+ Cassava + Maize + Pigeon Pea (Y+C+M+P) mixture were grown continuously for three years in an ultisol brought into cultivation as a virgin forestland. The objective was to compare yam yield va...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP138581
  • DOI 10.15192/PSCP.SA.2016.14.1.179184
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. O Raufu, I. O Oyewo, M. D Abdurrasheed (2016).  Impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the hhohho region of swaziland.. Scientia Agriculturae, 14(1), 179-184. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-138581