Impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the hhohho region of swaziland.

Journal Title: Scientia Agriculturae - Year 2016, Vol 14, Issue 1

Abstract

 Maize production on Swazi Nation Land (SNL) accounts for only 10% of total agricultural output in Swaziland. Although, almost all households in SNL produce maize, the country has never reached self-sufficient levels in maize production. Many farmers put the blame on the decline in rainfall, lower maize prices, and high input prices among others. The main objective of this study was therefore to assess the impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the Hhohho region of Swaziland. The Hhohho region has many sustainable water schemes than the other regions and it has the most favourable climatic conditions for maize production. To achieve this objective, primary data was collected from two groups of farmers (beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of the schemes). Profitability and the factors affecting participation were analysed through the farm budgetary and Logit regression analysis respectively while Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to examine the impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the area of study. Results showed that although farmers in the scheme incurred a more variable costs than those not in the scheme but they still make about trice the profit made by those not in the scheme. The relatively low profit by the farmers not in the scheme was largely attributed to the 76.8% of their total cost spent on fixed assets which significantly affect their profit level. Family size and family labour as well as irrigation and type of farming practice significantly affect participation in the water scheme. The water scheme had a positive impact on maize and the least a farmer could receive under the rural water scheme for maize cultivation is E2351.71. There is also a spillover effect of the water schemes on the non-beneficiary group by E1530.06 which means the intervention of water schemes might increase the non-beneficiaries output as well.

Authors and Affiliations

M. O Raufu , I. O Oyewo , M. D Abdurrasheed

Keywords

Related Articles

 Influence of Fertilization upon the Content of Chromium in the Fruit of Vegetable (Cucurbita Pepo l.) And The Quality of Fruit Marrows

 The content of chromium in the fruit of marrows is determined in different fertilization. Chromium is determined with the new method developed by us. Š¢he subordination is traced between the content of chromium and...

 Investigation of relationship between yield and dependent traits on yield in two group maturity of soybean by path analysis

 In order to investigation of relationship between effective traits on seed yield of soybean, an experiment was conducted as randomized complete block design with three replications at Agricultural Research Farm, Fa...

 Comparing Medicinal Plant Extracts and Pulsing Treatments on Rose Cut Flowers "Dolce Vita"

 The effect a pulse treatmentĀ¬ of 4%(w/v) calcium chloride + 3%(w/v) sucrose and deionised water(DI) in combination with medicinal plant extracts (Stevia rebaudiana, Thymus vulgaris)at 0.1,0.2 ppm for 24 h was...

 Response of rice crop to nitrogen and silicon in two irrigation systems

 Rice-based irrigated lowlands are the major cropping system in north of Iran. This experiment was carried out in split-split plot in basis of randomized complete block design with four replications at Sari, Mazanda...

 Growth and developmental behavior of Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) at leaf stage and flowering stages on different mustard genotypes

 Mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (kalt.) completed four nymphal instars on ten different genotypes at Hisar (Haryana) on both stages. The average nymphal period, reproductive period and Lifespan on both stages was f...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP138581
  • DOI 10.15192/PSCP.SA.2016.14.1.179184
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. O Raufu, I. O Oyewo, M. D Abdurrasheed (2016).  Impacts of rural water schemes on maize production in the hhohho region of swaziland.. Scientia Agriculturae, 14(1), 179-184. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-138581