Neo-institutionalism as a methodological one the basis for the study of informal institutes: an example of political corruption
Journal Title: Politicus - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue
Abstract
The possibilities of using the method of neoinstitutionalism for the analysis of informal political institutions are explored. Political corruption is defined as one of the types of informal institutions. The nature of informal political institutions from the standpoint of neo-institutionalism is characterized. The differences in the understanding of the political institute in the interpretation of institutionalism and neoinstitutionalism are emphasized.
Authors and Affiliations
І. В. Кушнарьов
Formation and stages of development of ethnopolitical conflictology in Russia
This article is devoted to the analysis of scantily explored problems of periodization of the evolution of the ethnopolitical conflict studies in Russia. Expediency of division of this contradictory process on three peri...
Migration processes and transit migration in Ukraine
The article analyzes the migration processes in Ukraine. There were discovered the reasons of the labor migration in Ukraine, as well as the analysis of transit migration as a phenomenon.
Neo-institutionalism as a methodological one the basis for the study of informal institutes: an example of political corruption
The possibilities of using the method of neoinstitutionalism for the analysis of informal political institutions are explored. Political corruption is defined as one of the types of informal institutions. The nature of i...
Parliamentary activities in the bodies Local Government: legal and creative approaches
The analysis of political-law principles of realization of deputy activity of representatives of territorial mass is conducted in composition the organs of local self-government. It is shown that the legal providing of a...
Prerequisites for implementation instruments of participatory democracy
The context which led to the popularity of participatory democracy ideas at the end of the 20th century is considered. Five groups of actors interested in the wide use of participatory democracy tools, in particular the...