Numerical evaluation of systematic errors of a non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement

Journal Title: Energetika - Year 2018, Vol 0, Issue 0

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring procedure can be applied to aid in secondary brain damage prevention. A high invasiveness of commonly used ICP measuring methods poses a risk of complications, and therefore new non-invasive methods are currently being developed. A promising non-invasive ICP measurement method is based on the existence of pressure balance state, which is driven by the unique morphological property of ophthalmic artery (OA). The value of ICP can be obtained by evaluating blood flow or artery characteristics in different OA segments, intracranial OA segment (IOA) and extracranial OA segment (EOA). In order to increase measurement accuracy, the systematic errors must be evaluated, which requires an implementation of a numerical model encompassing various physical phenomena. In this paper, a developed numerical model is presented, which was used to solve a transient fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problem of the pulsatile blood flow in a straight, physically meaningful anisotropic, hyperelastic OA, with ICP and external pressure (Pe) loads. It was found that the systematic error based on mean cross-sectional area difference between IOA and EOA segments was {–1.48, –1.37, –1.17} mmHg with ICP = {10, 20, 30} mmHg, respectively. The systematic error based on mean blood flow velocity difference between IOA and EOA segments was {–1.84, –1.76, –1.625} mmHg with ICP = {10, 20, 30} mmHg, respectively. The presented numerical model examined the worst-case scenario in terms of boundary conditions, which were immovable, while lengths of OA segments were physiologically relevant statistical means; however, the obtained systematic errors still met the clinical standards of ANSI/AAMI, where it is stated that the error should not exceed the ± 2 mmHg in the range of 0–20 mmHg of ICP. Boundary conditions and compliance affects the systematic error in both ways (reduce or increase it); this may explain the low systematic errors obtained in experimental studies by other authors.

Authors and Affiliations

Edgaras Misiulis, Gediminas Skarbalius, Algis Džiugys

Keywords

Related Articles

The use of mathematical models for modelling sulphur dioxide sorption on materials produced from fly ashes

Fly ash-derived zeolites may become an attractive alternative for natural zeolites as well as for zeolites produced out of pure chemicals. A growing awareness of the need to protect the environment is an incentive for th...

An approach to optimize the cycling operation of conventional combined heat and power plants

The implementation of the market mechanism, which includes electricity price fluctuation, and a wide integration of intermittent generation, namely solar PV and wind energy, in energy production have changed the role and...

Improvement methods for solving the distribution network reconfiguration problem

The paper presents methods for solving the distribution network reconfiguration problem based on heuristic algorithms. In particular, the study solved the distribution network reconfiguration problem for active power los...

Monte Carlo simulation of district heating system short-term operation in electricity markets

Energy generation in district heating (DH) systems is usually done in combined heat and power (CHP) units which can efficiently produce both useful heat and electric power. There can also exist heat only boilers, electri...

Performance characteristics of single-stage biohythane production by immobilized anaerobic bacteria

Biohythane produced via dark fermentation is much greener than hythane that is generated using natural gas. Biohythane production using a single-stage system has potential to increase the economic viability since it requ...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP435463
  • DOI 10.6001/energetika.v64i3.3805
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Edgaras Misiulis, Gediminas Skarbalius, Algis Džiugys (2018). Numerical evaluation of systematic errors of a non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement. Energetika, 0(0), 121-136. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-435463