On Determining the Qur’anic Suras as Meccan or Medinan: Sūrat al-Ḥajj as a Case Study

Journal Title: Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi - Year 2017, Vol 58, Issue 1

Abstract

This article contains two discussions. The first one is to determine whether or not the features of Meccan and Medinan suras presented in the classical ulūm al-Qurān sources are general descriptions. The second one is to examine which source is more decisive in determining the revelation period of a sura (i.e. Meccan or Medinan): is it the stylistic features and the content of the suras or the riwāyas about the historical contexts of verses? This article tackles these two issues by analyzing the sūrat al-Ḥajj as a case in point. To that end, I compare 14 classical sources in ulūm al-Qurān with a view to finding out the course of development of the feature of the suras over the years in a comparative fashion and to see what this amount to for the sūrat al-Ḥajj. After analyzing the stylistic features and the riwāyas pertaining to the historical contexts of the verses, I basically conclude that the riwāyas are more decisive in determining its revelation period and that sūrat al-Ḥajj is Medinan.

Authors and Affiliations

Esra Gözeler

Keywords

Related Articles

A Critical Overview of Religious Market Theory

The secularization thesis expects the decline of religion as a result of the modernization process. However, with modernization the effect of religion is not diminished in many societies and in some modern societies such...

MUSTAFĪḌ REPORTS IN SHĀFIʿĪ LEGAL THEORY

It is generally accepted that the majority of the fuqahāʾ (legal experts), except for the Ḥanafī school, divide the reports from the Prophet, with regard to the number of transmitters, into two parts: al-mutawātir and al...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP602049
  • DOI 10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001462
  • Views 116
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Esra Gözeler (2017). On Determining the Qur’anic Suras as Meccan or Medinan: Sūrat al-Ḥajj as a Case Study. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(1), 69-108. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-602049