On the constitutionality control of the acts issued by the government of Romania

Journal Title: Polish Law Review - Year 2016, Vol 2, Issue 2

Abstract

Together with the Romanian President, the Government forms the executive. In its activity, the Government issues two categories of acts: decisions, which are the acts that organize the enforcement of laws (an activity that lies within its exclusive competence) and ordinances, by means of which a genuine delegated legislative activity is carried out.<br/><br/>All acts issued by the Government are subject to control, but the nature of this review differs depending on the nature of the act. Thus, while decisions are subject only to a review of legality, which is exercised by the courts, under the Law of the Contentious- Administrative, ordinances are subject to both a review of legality and to a review of constitutionality. The peculiarities of the procedure for adopting Government ordinances also made their procedure of constitutionality control differ in some respects from the procedure for reviewing the constitutionality of laws.<br/><br/>Thus, the constitutionality control of government ordinances is performed only after their entry into force, by settling the exceptions of unconstitutionality by the Constitutional Court; the exception of unconstitutionality may be brought to court only with the introduction of an action before the contentious-administrative court and not before another court or in another stage of the proceedings; the holder of the objection of unconstitutionality is only the applicant in the proceeding; the resolution of rejecting the criticism of unconstitutionality is a plea of inadmissibility, which, in all cases, obliges the contentious-administrative court to overrule the action as inadmissible. As an exception, the Ombudsman may appeal directly to the Constitutional Court against a government ordinance or against a provision of an ordinance, without having to file for a common law action.<br/><br/>

Authors and Affiliations

Eugen Chelaru

Keywords

Related Articles

Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with the effects of climate changes

The purpose of this article is to present the mechanism of financing activities related to the negative effects of climate phenomena, which was adopted during the United Nations Conference on Climate Change (COP 19), in...

Granice naturalizmu - granice nauk prawnych

Współczesny rozwój nauk przyrodniczych na nowo rozbudził dyskusje nad możliwościami i potrzebą naturalizacji nauk społecznych i humanistyki. Prowadzi to także do pytań o zakres w jakim naturalizacja mogłaby dotyczyć takż...

The conscience clause in medicine – does it guarantee or restrict the freedom of conscience of healthcare personnel?

Medical problems surrounding the Conscience Clause have dominated the last year in both the arenas of public discourse and a professional one as well. Such problems have arisen in medical professions, of course, but also...

Inheritance by the deceased's grandparents in Polish civil law

This article analyzes the principles of statutory inheritance of the deceased's grandparents. It has been shown that their situation has improved as a result of recent changes in the Polish Civil Code. However, increased...

Klauzula sumienia w medycynie – gwarancja czy ograniczenie wolności sumienia pracowników ochrony zdrowia?

Problem lekarskiej klauzuli sumienia zdominował w ubiegłym roku zarówno dyskurs publiczny, jak profesjonalny - prowadzony w środowiskach lekarskich, prawniczych, a także etyków. W niniejszym opracowaniu podjęta została p...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP188290
  • DOI 10.5604/24509841.1230281
  • Views 107
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eugen Chelaru (2016). On the constitutionality control of the acts issued by the government of Romania. Polish Law Review, 2(2), 66-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-188290