On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 5

Abstract

Experiments have suggested that decisions from experience differ from decisions from description. In experience-based decisions, the decision makers often fail to maximise their payoffs. Previous authors have ascribed the effect of underweighting of rare outcomes to this deviation from maximisation. In this paper, I re-examine and provide further analysis on the effect with an experiment that involves a series of simple binary choice gambles. In the current experiment, decisions that bear small consequences are repeated hundreds of times, feedback on the consequence of each decision is provided immediately, and decision outcomes are accumulated. The participants have to learn about the outcome distributions through sampling, as they are not explicitly provided with prior information on the payoff structure. The current results suggest that the “hot stove effect” is stronger than suggested by previous research and is as important as the payoff variability effect and the effect of underweighting of rare outcomes in analysing decisions from experience in which the features of gambles must be learned through a sampling process.

Authors and Affiliations

Takemi Fujikawa

Keywords

Related Articles

Procedural priming of a numerical cognitive illusion

A strategy activated in one task may be transferred to subsequent tasks and prevent activation of other strategies that would otherwise come to mind, a mechanism referred to as procedural priming. In a novel application...

The effect of incomplete information on the compromise effect

Most research on the compromise effect focuses on how consumers make their decisions in a complete information scenario; however, consumers generally lack sufficient information when they make purchase decisions. This re...

The effects of total sleep deprivation on bayesian updating

Subjects performed a decision task (Grether, 1980) in both a well-rested and experimentally sleep-deprived state. We found two main results: 1) final choice accuracy was unaffected by sleep deprivation, and yet 2) the es...

The effects of attractive but unattainable alternatives on the attractiveness of near and distant future menus

We examine how adding an Attractive but Unattainable Alternative (AUA) to a set of available but less attractive alternatives influences evaluations of near vs. distant future sets of alternatives. According to Construal...

Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in entering a risky lottery

A gender difference in risk preferences, with women being more averse to risky choices, is a robust experimental finding. Speculating on the sources of this difference, Croson and Gneezy recently pointed to the tendency...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677698
  • DOI -
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Takemi Fujikawa (2009). On the relative importance of the hot stove effect and the tendency to rely on small samples. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677698