Cynicism in negotiation: When communication increases buyers’ skepticism

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 3

Abstract

The economic literature on negotiation shows that strategic concerns can be a barrier to agreement, even when the buyer values the good more than the seller. Yet behavioral research demonstrates that human interaction can overcome these strategic concerns through communication. We show that there is also a downside of this human interaction: cynicism. Across two studies we focus on a seller-buyer interaction in which the buyer has uncertain knowledge about the goods for sale, but has a positive expected payoff from saying “yes” to the available transaction. Study 1 shows that most buyers accept offers made by computers, but that acceptance rates drop significantly when offers are made by human sellers who communicate directly with buyers. Study 2 clarifies that this effect results from allowing human sellers to communicate with buyers, and shows that such communication focuses the buyers’ attention on the seller’s trustworthiness. The mere situation of negotiated interaction increases buyers’ attention to the sellers’ self-serving motives and, consequently, buyers’ cynicism. Unaware of this downside of interaction, sellers actually prefer to have the opportunity to communicate with buyers.

Authors and Affiliations

Eyal Ert, Stephanie Creary and Max H. Bazerman

Keywords

Related Articles

Boundary effects in the Marschak-Machina triangle

This paper presents the results of a study that sheds new light on the shape of indifference curves in the Marschak-Machina triangle. The most important observation, obtained non-parametrically, concerns jumps in indiffe...

Choice-induced preference change and the free-choice paradigm: A clarification

Positive spreading of ratings or rankings in the classical free-choice paradigm is commonly taken to indicate choice-induced change in preferences and has motivated influential theories as cognitive dissonance theory and...

A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding

The moral dumbfounding phenomenon for harmless taboo violations is often cited as a critical piece of empirical evidence motivating anti-rationalist models of moral judgment and decision-making. Moral dumbfounding purpor...

Trade-upgrade framing effects: Trades are losses, but upgrades are improvements

In two studies, people were reluctant to trade items they own, but glad to accept upgrades with identical end states. The framing of the transaction makes a difference. A mediational analysis suggests that the relationsh...

Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy

We examine two departures of individual perceptions of randomness from probability theory: the hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy, and their respective opposites. This paper’s first contribution is to use data from the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678122
  • DOI -
  • Views 132
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Eyal Ert, Stephanie Creary and Max H. Bazerman (2014). Cynicism in negotiation: When communication increases buyers’ skepticism. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678122