Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy- A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendicectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendicectomy, it has a safety profile better than open procedure. Objectives: Laparoscopic procedure for appendicectomy is compared with open surgical technique with respect to:  Duration of procedure.  Post operative pain.  Duration of analgesic use.  Complication encountered  Post operative length of hospital stay.  Conversion to open appendectomy Methods: Prospective study from December 2008 to May 2010, involved 50 patients with diagnosis of acute or recurrent appendicitis was entered into a study randomizing the choice of operation to either the open or the laparoscopic technique. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi-square test and students ‘t’ test. Results: 25 patients were assigned to the laparoscopic appendicectomy group and 25 patients were assigned to the open appendicectomy group. There were statistically significant difference noted in respect to postoperative pain (LA, 1.21 ± 0.63 Vs. OA, 2.72±0.87: P<0.001) duration of analgesic used (LA,2.2 ± 1.08 Vs. OA, 6.44 ± 1.84:P<0.001) postoperative complications like vomiting [LA, 2 (8%) Vs. O.A, 7 (28%), fever [LA, 1 (4%) Vs. OA, 4 (16%), wound infection [LA, 1 (4% Vs. OA, 5 (20%), ileus (LA, 17.3 ± 7.1 Vs. OA, 30.8±8.9:P<0.001) postoperative length of hospital stay (LA,2.8±1.23 Vs. OA, 7.7±1.95:P<0.001) and return to normal work (LA,13.5±2.86 Vs.OA, 20.8 ± 3.21:P<0.01) .Although above mentioned advantage were at the cost of slightly increased duration of surgery (LA,71.2 ± 19.23 Vs.OA,53.8 ± 20.04:P<0.01). Conclusions: The patients who underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy had less postoperative pain and shorter duration of analgesic use, less postoperative complications like vomiting, fever ileus and wound infection with shorter postoperative duration of hospital stay and return to normal work when compared with patients who underwent open appendicectomy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy is better than open appendicectomy in selected patients with acute or recurrent appendicitis.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Tanmay Mehta

Keywords

Related Articles

A Randomised Control Study: Post operative analgesic effect of Dexmedetomidine Administration in Wound Infiltration for Abdominal Hysterectomy

Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with moderate to severe post-operative pain. The postoperative pain not only delays recovery but also can lead to chronic pain. A multimodal approach to pain is the current standard i...

Effectiveness of 2 Weeks Qigong Exercise Therapy Vs Conventional Physiotherapy Management in Post Surgical Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trail

Background- Breast cancer being the most prevalent cancer amongst women has the highest survival rates amongst all cancer. Surgery is a part of therapeutic process that helps in preventing metastases. However, it can sig...

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei

Pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome is characterized by mucinous ascites and mucinous tumor disseminated on peritoneal surfaces. The disease almost always originates from a perforated appendiceal epithelial tumor. Appendix t...

Evaluation of various closure techniques after laparotomy

Introduction: Every operation requires one of closure techniques to close the wound for subsequent successful healing, proper closing of wound influence the success of surgery. Many complications such as infection, wound...

A Study on Clinical Evaluation of Ectropion

Out word rolling of the lower eyelid away from the eye, exposing the surface of the inner eyelid, is called ectropion. This condition can cause eye dryness, excessive tearing, burning and irritation. The primary cause of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP273198
  • DOI -
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Tanmay Mehta (2017). Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendicectomy- A Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(1), 15795-15808. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-273198