Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2015, Vol 45, Issue 1

Abstract

Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position: The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski

Keywords

Related Articles

Kontakt zatrzymanego z pełnomocnikiem (art. 245 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania karnego)

The subject of the assessment is a petition requesting the change of Article 245 § 1 of CCP by indicating a method of contact of a detainee with an advocate or a legal advisor. The petitioner suggests that the code shoul...

Uprawnienia posłów do uczestnictwa w sesjach sejmików oraz rad gmin i powiatów

The opinion states that the council (sejmik) should “adopt a position” regarding comments and motions of a Deputy. However, motions submitted by the Deputy do not initiate - contrary Deputies’ interventions - any separat...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt P 3/14

In the proposed draft position the author points to the incompatibility with the Constitution of Article 51 para. 1 subpara. 3 of the Act on Court Bailiffs and Enforcement insofar as it does not provide for a separate fi...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 45/16

In the Sejm’s draft position, concerning the application of the National Council of Agricultural Chambers, the author claims that rules of the Hunting Law, so far as they do not provide obligatory permit from a farmer –...

Opinia na temat, czy podpisana 14 września 2015 r. w Rzymie deklaracja „Większa integracja europejska: droga naprzód” powinna zostać podpisana, odrzucona, czy też należy dążyć do wprowadzenia do jej tekstu zmian

Even if the Declaration is not a binding document, in the author’s opinion, it cannot be ignored. It expressly outlines a scenario for federalization of the European Union. The future directions of European integration c...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP199078
  • DOI -
  • Views 74
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski (2015). Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 45(1), 75-82. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-199078