Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2015, Vol 45, Issue 1

Abstract

Legal opinion on the possibility of speaking in the debate on the motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm by the Marshal of the Sejm or a Deputy recommended for this position: The author analyzes the normative model derived from the Standing Orders of the Sejm and confronts the theoretical assumptions with parliamentary practice accompanying the procedure for election of the Marshal of the Sejm, based on its similarity to the procedure for recall of the Marshal of the Sejm. He argues that the general principles set out in Chapter 2, “Debates of the Sejm” in Section III of the Standing Orders of the Sejm, should apply to this matter in question. The said provisions do not provide for specific powers that would give the Deputies subject to the motion for the recall of the Marshal of the Sejm the right to speak in the debate in accordance with the rules different from those defining the procedure for taking floor by other speakers. It should be assumed that in the debate on a motion to recall the Marshal of the Sejm the questions in the debate can be responded by their intended addressees, i.e. a person subject to the motion or the designated candidate. There is no specific basis in the Standing Orders that would allow giving a speech by the Deputy subject to the motion when no question has been addressed to him/her during the debate.

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski

Keywords

Related Articles

Opinia w sprawie wniosku dotyczącego dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie niektórych aspektów umów sprzedaży towarów zawieranych przez internet lub w inny sposób na odległość [COM(2015) 635 final]

The aim of the proposed directive is full harmonization of national legislation on consumer goods in relation to conformity with the contract for distance sale, the seller’s liability for lack of conformity of goods with...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt P 12/141

Sejm draft position on case ref. no. P 12/14: The position of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerns Article 207 § 3 second sentence in conjunction with § 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), establishing a proce...

Możliwość nagrywania i publikowania zdjęć ze spotkań z posłem

In the author’s opinion, a consent to distribute the image of a person is not required in several cases. Firstly, if it is only a detail of the whole image, e.g. of a public gathering or event. Secondly, if it is an imag...

Poselski projekt uchwały w sprawie powołania Komisji śledczej do zbadania prawidłowości i legalności działań organów i instytucji publicznych podejmowanych wobec Getin Noble Bank SA oraz Idea Bank SA w latach 2016–2018

According to the author of the opinion, the discussed draft resolution meets formal requirements set out in the Act on Sejm Investigative Committees and the Standing Orders of the Sejm. On the other hand, the draft resol...

Opinia prawna w sprawie udostępniania osobom trzecim pism wpływających do biura poselskiego

The author states that a Deputy does not have an obligation to make available document received from a private person, regardless the content of the document. Parliamentary immunity, according to the author, does not rel...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP199078
  • DOI -
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Odrowąż-Sypniewski (2015). Opinia prawna w sprawie możliwości zabrania głosu w debacie nad wnioskiem o odwołanie Marszałka Sejmu przez Marszałka Sejmu lub posła rekomendowanego na to stanowisko. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 45(1), 75-82. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-199078