Oral versus rectal laxatives for functional constipation in child

Journal Title: Paediatrica Indonesiana - Year 2016, Vol 56, Issue 3

Abstract

Background Functional constipation is a common childhood condition. Benefits of oral and rectal laxatives in terms of recovery and recurrence in children with functional constipation are still controversial.Objective To compare the effectiveness of oral and rectal laxatives in terms of recovery and recurrence in children with functional constipation.Methods Children aged 8 to 17 years who met the Rome III criteria for functional constipation were enrolled in this open randomised trial. Data was collected through questionnaires, interviews, and physical examinations. The participants were randomly assigned to receive stimulant laxatives (5 mg bisacodyl) either orally for three consecutive days or rectally in a single dose. Subjects kept daily defecation records for 7 days, and were followed up on days 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Comparisons of defecation patterns and recurrence of constipation between groups were assessed using Chi-square test.Results Of 99 subjects, 46 children (5 boys, 41 girls) received oral laxatives (group I) and 45 children (8 boys, 37 girls) received rectal laxatives (group II). Four children in each group dropped out. Baseline characteristics are comparable between the groups. Rate of recovery in the first 7 days was higher in the oral compared to rectal groups [84.8% versus 73.3%, respectively, but this was not statistically sininficant (P=0.278)]. In the second week, the recurrence of constipation was significantly higher in the rectal (57.5%) than in the oral laxative group (42.5%) (P=0.026).Conclusion Although recovery tends to occur more with oral compared to rectal laxative agents, the difference was not statistically significant. Higher recurrence in the second week after treatment occurred with rectal laxative agent. [Paediatr Indones. 2016;56:162-6.].

Authors and Affiliations

Wiji Pranoto, Supriatmo Supriatmo, Melda Deliana, Atan Sinuhaji

Keywords

Related Articles

Tuberculosis risk factors in children with smear-positive tuberculosis adult as household contact

Background Children in household contact of adults with smear-positive tuberculosis (TB) are at higher risk of TB infection. Screening of these children is a main strategy for eliminating childhood TB.Objective To determ...

Continuous sedation vs. daily sedation interruption in mechanically-ventilated children

Background A daily sedation interruption (DSI) protocol in ventilated patientsis an effective method of improving sedation management that decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation. In adult patients, it is a safe...

Effect of glucocorticoid therapy on adrenal function in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BackgroundGlucocorticoids play an important role in thetreatment ofacute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but can causeside effects such as suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis. Suppression of the HPA...

Effects of Nigella sativa oil on Th1/Th2, cytokine balance, and improvement of asthma control in children

Background Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by involvement of a variety of inflammatory cells. Asthma is associated with imbalances between Th1/Th2 cells and their characteristic cyto...

Left ventricular mass in male adolescent athletes and non-athletes

Background Systematic exercise leads to increased left ventricular mass, which may be misleading in a differential diagnosis of heart disease in athletes (physiologic hypertrophy versus pathologic hypertrophy). T he caus...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP446125
  • DOI 10.14238/pi56.3.2016.162-6
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wiji Pranoto, Supriatmo Supriatmo, Melda Deliana, Atan Sinuhaji (2016). Oral versus rectal laxatives for functional constipation in child. Paediatrica Indonesiana, 56(3), 162-6. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-446125