Patient complaints at three public hospitals in Greece: Who cares?
Journal Title: Αρχεία Ελληνικής Ιατρικής - Year 2013, Vol 30, Issue 1
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluation of the process implemented for handling formal written complaints in public hospitals, in the context of effective management, orderly hospital operation and continuous improvement of the quality of the services provided. METHOD A descriptive study at one specialized and two general university hospitals in the Athens area of all the letters of complaints (n=105), submitted during the period 2008−2010, with their answers (n=78), where given. Interviews (n=6) were conducted to record the views of the members of the Committees of Citizen Rights Advocacy who handled these complaints. In data analysis were used both quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS The complaints had been submitted in approximately equal proportion by patients (51.4%) and relatives of patients (48.6%), and were related mainly to the outpatient clinics (40.4%), and the medical (16.4%) and emergency (9.6%) departments. Major sources of dissatisfaction leading to complaint submission were the ineffective framework of administrative procedures (32.1%), the inappropriate behavior of staff (24.7%), the inadequate medical and nursing care of patients (21.8%), the poor communication between the hospital and the users (20.6%) and the excessive waiting time (19%). Almost half of the complainants wanted the incident to become known at a higher level of administration, with nearly 6 in 10 demanding measures to be taken in order to solve the indicated problems or punish the hospital staff named as offenders. In terms of management, it was found that the majority of complainants had received a response, but it appeared to be no clear intent of the hospital to solve the problem or take specific corrective action. Hospital managers usually deny or contradict serious allegations and, in addition, the committees responsible for complaints management appear to be reluctant to clearly recommend sanctions against putative perpetrators. CONCLUSIONS This particular method of complaints handling does not appear to work, neither as a tool for system feedback and effective management, nor as a means of the complainants' relief. Conversely, it corroborates an authoritarian mechanism which does not sufficiently respect the patients and their relatives and does not learn from its mistakes, as it fails to recognize them.
Authors and Affiliations
P. MINAKI, E. SAMOLI, M. THEODOROU
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP161691
- DOI -
- Views 60
- Downloads 0
The surgical management of organic constipation in children aged over one year
Constipation with an organic cause mainly arises in the neonatal period and during infancy, with the transition from breast feeding to formula milk. In children older than one year, functional constipation is diagnosed i...
The pharmacοlogical treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of Alzheimer's disease
The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is increasing rapidly and it is becoming a scourge of our times. Behavioral and psychological symptoms are a common aspect of the spectrum of the disease symptoms and are associated...
Unilateral hypertranslucent hemithorax
No abstract available
Comparative surveys for patient satisfaction between hospitals in Athens
ΟBJECTIVE Quality management systems play an increasing role in the health systems of developed countries. Hospital units are attempting to deal with the implementation of the notion of quality in their services. The mai...
Lung edema and thrombosis induced by activated mannose-binding lectinassociated serine protease 2 and MHC class I reactions, and liver thrombosis aggravated by suppressed phosphotyrosine and female donor reactions to male-specific antigens in Lewis rats
OBJECTIVE The causes of lung edema and thrombosis and liver embolism were investigated in rats. METHOD Lewis rats were used. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL)-associated serine protease 2 (MASP-2) antibody (Ab) was injecte...