Patočka, Merleau-Ponty et la question des limites de la phénoménologie
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2013, Vol 5, Issue 1
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to lay out the similarities between the philosophical projects of Patočka and Merleau-Ponty, with respect to the question of the “limits of phenomenology”. We suggest that both these authors propose two complementary strategies in their attempt of overcoming the Husserlian phenomenology. The first one consists in extending the field of phenomenology so as for it to be able to encompass phenomena either insufficiently explored or misinterpreted by the conceptuality that Husserl put forth; the second strategy, more ambitious, aims to overpass the very standpoint of phenomenology in favour of an ontological approach. We try to show that what profoundly motivates these attempts is a radical – and hence, ontological – reinterpretation of the Lebenswelt.
Authors and Affiliations
Ovidiu Stanciu
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP104749
- DOI -
- Views 122
- Downloads 0
Pourquoi revient-on toujours à Darwin?
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Postmodernism Revisited: Current Trends and Interpretations
Stuart Sim, Fifty Key Postmodern Thinkers. London and New York: Routledge, 2013, 264 p.
The Problem of Truth in Heidegger’s Being and Time
The aim of the present paper is to analyse the way in which Heidegger’s work Being and Time is based on the relationship between four concepts with methodological function: phenomenon, logos, interpretation (Auslegung),...
In Search for Forgiveness
Simon D. Podmore, Kierkegaard and the Self Before God Anatomy of the Abyss, Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Religion, Bloomington, 2011, 280p.
Le temps avec les autres
The article follows the mutation suffered by the issue of alterity from Husserl to Heidegger and from Heidegger to Lévinas, envisaging it starting from temporality. We aim at replacing the question “Where is the other?”...