Pourquoi revient-on toujours à Darwin?
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2011, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Authors and Affiliations
Ciprian Jeler
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP134877
- DOI -
- Views 110
- Downloads 0
The subjective and intersubjective dimensions in the hermeneutical theory of translation
This essay first examines the issue of intersubjectivity in terms of the paradigmatic relationship between I and You. From a grammatical standpoint this relationship seems asymmetrical as well as necessarily performative...
Deleuze and the Expression of Jurisprudence
Edward Mussawir, Jurisdiction in Deleuze. The expression and representation of law, New York: Routledge, 2011
On the New Era of the Phenomenology of Religion? On the Recent Works of Natalie Depraz and Anthony J. Steinbock
Phenomenology of religion is among the oldest branches of the discipline founded by Husserl. It has always been difficult to define its outlines: from the very first essays of Scheler, Reinach and Heidegger to the so-cal...
Foucauldian Power and Natural Selection: A Comparison and a Divergence
This paper has a triple aim. First of all, it makes a comparison between Foucault’s notion of power relations and the notion of natural selection as it has been developed, since Darwin, by evolutionary biology. A number...
Philosophy: Morphology without Laws. Goethe and Wittgenstein on the Limits of Science
The present text exposes the influence of Goethe’s morphology on Wittgenstein’s concept of perspicuous representation. Through this process, it is demonstrated that Goethe and Wittgenstein, each in their manner, in diffe...