PERSONALISM IN THE LUBLIN SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY (CARD. KAROL WOJTYŁA, FR. MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC)

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2016, Vol 5, Issue 2

Abstract

The article presents the conception of personalism and the understanding of human person developed by two Polish philosophers: Karol Wojtyła and Mieczysław A. Krąpiec, the framers and the main representatives of the Lublin School of Philosophy. The author comes to the following conclusions: (1) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of personalism comes from experience and seeks verification in experience; it does not accept any a priori explanations or theses, though it does not shy away from drawing upon different branches of knowledge in its attempts to broaden experience, being aware that not everything is given to immediate experiential perception; (2) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s personalism wants to draw on the whole philosophical tradition, taking into account, at the same time, the findings of different sciences of man or humanities which broaden the experience of man or contribute something to the interpretation of experience; (3) bringing together genetic empiricism and methodical rationalism, Wo-jtyła and Krąpiec are able to avoid radicalism in the explanation of man, making a successful attempt to join in a complementary way these aspects of personal human being which carry some opposition; (4) Wojtyła’s and Krąpiec’s conception of person does not bear any traces of antagonism since it is not directed against anyone; in the light of this conception every human person has a character of the honest good which is the unconditional good, that is the highest and the ultimate good not competing with the value of anything else; (5) Wojtyła and Krąpiec prove that the conception of human person lies at the basis of understanding society, culture, ethics, law, politics, economy, art, and even religion.

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Duma

Keywords

Related Articles

THE SERVIENT CHARACTER OF POLITICAL POWER ACCORDING TO ST. THOMAS AQUINAS

The author attempts to justify the thesis of the servient character of political power. By his analyses, he arrives at two conclusions. First, the ultimate goal of service fulfilled by political power should be identical...

La plenitudo potestatis Papae según Egidio Romano

This article analyzes the relationship, according to Aegidius Romanus, between spiritual power and temporal power. From the point of view of the Augustinian author, the autonomy of the world or that of second causes, fol...

WE ARE MODERN AND WANT TO BE MODERN

The author traces the thought of George Santayana, Brad S. Gregory, Pierre Manent, and Rémi Brague, who addressed the transformation of the West into its modern present. They all show that by being cut off from its cultu...

El oscurecimiento del ser y su sustitución por la existencia

Title: "The Obscuring of Esse and Its Substitution by Existence." The question of the real distinction between esse and essence in being constitutes the core of Thomistic ontology. While there is a primacy of esse over...

LOVE AS THE PRINCIPLE OF THE DYNAMISM OF BEINGS (AN ANALYSIS OF THE ARGUMENTS OF ST. THOMAS AQUINAS)

In ancient times, people pondered “cosmic love” (eros, philotes, thymos), i.e., the universal power that underlies the phenomena of the universe. The force of love extends to all things, including man and his action. Phi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP253263
  • DOI -
  • Views 208
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Tomasz Duma (2016). PERSONALISM IN THE LUBLIN SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY (CARD. KAROL WOJTYŁA, FR. MIECZYSŁAW A. KRĄPIEC). Studia Gilsoniana, 5(2), 365-390. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-253263