Physiological and performance characteristics of road, mountain bike and BMX cyclists
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 3
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to quantify several physiological and power output characteristics of high-performance road, cross-country mountain bike (XCMB), downhill mountain bike (DHMB) and bicycle motocross (BMX) cyclists. Twenty-four high-performance cyclists (27 ± 7 yr; 182 ± 6 cm; 79.3 ± 9.7 kg; ∑7SF 69 ± 27 mm; 61.4 ± 9.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed both an incremental ramp test and a power profile assessment (PPA) across two separate testing sessions. The PPA consisted of maximal efforts lasting 5 s, 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 240 s, and 600 s. The ramp test provided measures of VO2MAX, maximal aerobic power (MAP) and individual VO2-power regression equations, whilst the PPA determined metabolic costs, anaerobic capacity and power output across each effort. The data demonstrated that road and XCMB cyclists possessed significantly (p<0.05) higher VO2MAX (65.3-69.6 vs. 52.4-55.3 mL.kg-1.min-1) and anaerobic capacities (1.7-1.8 vs. 0.9-1.3 L) than the DHMB and BMX cyclists. Further, the same cohorts produced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater MAP (5.8-6.3 vs 4.4-4.7 W.kg-1), as well as relative mean power output across efforts lasting ≥15 s. The BMX and DHMB cyclists demonstrated greater peak power outputs (~200 W) across the shorter efforts of the power profile. The data demonstrate that the road and XCMB cyclists possessed higher aerobic physiological capacities and power outputs than the DHMB and BMX cyclists. The latter disciplines possessed greater explosive power outputs. Together, these findings reflect the specificity of selected traits that are possessed within each cycling discipline.
Authors and Affiliations
Andrew R Novak| Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia, Benjamin J Dascombe| Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia.Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2895
- DOI -
- Views 421
- Downloads 20
Low back pain in cycling: does it matter how you sit?
Low Back Pain (LBP) is a common problem among cyclists, although studies investigating LBP during cycling are scarce. Most studies have focused on LBP and geometric bike-related variables. Until now no cycling field stu...
Increased physical effort overrides the potentially deleterious effects of resource depletion following self-control
Background: Long duration cycling events require riders to maintain concentration and self-control over lengthy periods, for example, listening to race plans and/or eve-dropping on conversations of other riders whilst...
Wind speed, wind yaw and the aerodynamic drag acting on a bicycle and rider
A large portion of a cyclist’s power is consumed by air drag. Opposing force power meters measure air drag with a wind sensor. In cross winds the bicycle and rider experience a different air drag than that informed by a...
Individualising training intensity to reduce inter-individual variability in training response in trained cyclists
Training to improve endurance performance commonly results in large inter-individual variability (IIV) in response (Bouchard et al. [1998]. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(2), 252–258; Mann et al. [2014]....
Validity of the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer and Reliability of a 4 km Cycle Time Trial
Purpose: To assess the validity of power and the reliability of a 4 km cycle time trial (TT) using the Wahoo KICKR Power Trainer. Methods: The Wahoo KICKR power output was assessed using a dynamic calibration rig (DCR...