Physiological and performance characteristics of road, mountain bike and BMX cyclists
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 3
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to quantify several physiological and power output characteristics of high-performance road, cross-country mountain bike (XCMB), downhill mountain bike (DHMB) and bicycle motocross (BMX) cyclists. Twenty-four high-performance cyclists (27 ± 7 yr; 182 ± 6 cm; 79.3 ± 9.7 kg; ∑7SF 69 ± 27 mm; 61.4 ± 9.9 mL·kg-1·min-1) completed both an incremental ramp test and a power profile assessment (PPA) across two separate testing sessions. The PPA consisted of maximal efforts lasting 5 s, 15 s, 30 s, 60 s, 240 s, and 600 s. The ramp test provided measures of VO2MAX, maximal aerobic power (MAP) and individual VO2-power regression equations, whilst the PPA determined metabolic costs, anaerobic capacity and power output across each effort. The data demonstrated that road and XCMB cyclists possessed significantly (p<0.05) higher VO2MAX (65.3-69.6 vs. 52.4-55.3 mL.kg-1.min-1) and anaerobic capacities (1.7-1.8 vs. 0.9-1.3 L) than the DHMB and BMX cyclists. Further, the same cohorts produced significantly (p ≤ 0.05) greater MAP (5.8-6.3 vs 4.4-4.7 W.kg-1), as well as relative mean power output across efforts lasting ≥15 s. The BMX and DHMB cyclists demonstrated greater peak power outputs (~200 W) across the shorter efforts of the power profile. The data demonstrate that the road and XCMB cyclists possessed higher aerobic physiological capacities and power outputs than the DHMB and BMX cyclists. The latter disciplines possessed greater explosive power outputs. Together, these findings reflect the specificity of selected traits that are possessed within each cycling discipline.
Authors and Affiliations
Andrew R Novak| Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia, Benjamin J Dascombe| Applied Sports Science and Exercise Testing Laboratory, School of Environmental and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, Australia.Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2895
- DOI -
- Views 373
- Downloads 20
Comparing time-trial and time to exhaustion performance
Introduction: Time to exhaustion trials (TTE) at a fixed exercise intensity have been widely used in a laboratory setting to measure endurance performance. However, they have been criticised for lacking ecological validi...
Preliminary results: A comparison of specific imu-based calibrations for cycling vs. conventional methods.
Recent technological advances in MEMS allow considering the biomechanical evaluation of cyclists outside the laboratory (road, track cycling, etc). Indeed, optoelectronical motion capture in cycling is commonely used in...
The effects of different strength training regimes on cycling performance
Background: There is conflicting literature on the effect of strength training on road cycling performance, with the most recent literature showing a positive effect with maximal strength training (Rønnestad & Mujika, 20...
Short term parasympathetic reactivation after the LSCT: a practical tool to predict and monitor cycling performance
The measurement of heart rate recovery (HRR) and parasympathetic reactivation after exercise to predict and monitor changes in training status has gained popularity over the last few years (Daanen et al, 2012, Bellenger...
Individualised training duration induces similar physiological and performance benefits at different intensities
Background: When comparing the effects of different training intensities, studies often standardise for energy expenditure. These studies tend to suggest that high intensity training (HIT) provides greater or similar ben...