Pill or bill? Influence of monetary incentives on the perceived riskiness and the ethical approval of clinical trials
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 2
Abstract
In clinical trials, incentivizing human research subjects with large amounts of money is often considered unethical, as it may coerce people to participate. This argument implies that people perceive rewards (i.e., incentives) independently of risks (i.e., probability of side-effects) or that they assume that larger rewards are associated with lower risks. However, past research on risk perception indicates that people associate higher rewards with higher risks. To test whether people treat incentives in clinical trials as a proxy for risk, we conducted an online experiment (N = 483) in which people estimated the riskiness of hypothetical clinical trials. We manipulated the monetary incentives that participants of the clinical trials were offered. The results show that people expect more side effects if the monetary incentives for participation are higher. Results further show that the majority of participants were more likely to ethically approve a trial if it offered a high monetary incentive. In contrast to existing ethical guidelines these results suggest that paying large rewards may be less problematic because people implicitly associate them with higher risk and because they trade-off risks and financial benefits.
Authors and Affiliations
Janine Hoffart and Benjamin Scheibehenne
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678404
- DOI -
- Views 120
- Downloads 0
A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation
Taxation policy is driven by many factors, including public opinion, but little research has examined the strength and stability of the public’s taxation preferences. This paper demonstrates one way in which preferences...
Hold on to it? An experimental analysis of the disposition effect
This paper experimentally investigates a well-known anomaly in portfolio management, i.e., the fact that paper losses are realized less than paper gains (disposition effect). I confirm the existence of the disposition ef...
Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time
Research on the processing of recognition information has focused on testing the recognition heuristic (RH). On the aggregate, the noncompensatory use of recognition information postulated by the RH was rejected in sever...
Cultural differences in risk: The group facilitation effect
We compared South Koreans with Australians in order to characterize cultural differences in attitudes and choices regarding risk, at both the individual and group levels. Our results showed that Australians, when assesse...
Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard.
We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...