Post-Structuralist Aesthetics and the Paradoxical Nature of Language

Journal Title: Notions A Journal of English Literature - Year 2017, Vol 0, Issue 2

Abstract

Until the late 60’s, despite the prevalence of pluralistic approaches and multi-fanged practices, the relationship among the author, the text and the reader, and the definition of literature itself was of mutual respect and concern. Literary critics going all the way back to the days of Plato, has developed the genre, and ultimately provides us with parameters on how to study , analyze, deconstruct, interpret and evaluate literary works emphasizing the centrality of the author, the reader, or the context with varying degrees. Though the term “literature” existed even before, it was only from Mathew Arnold onwards that the term that came to take on the meaning of creative and imaginative literature only. David Lodge, favoring majority of contemporary critics, argues that ‘literature is language at its fullest stretch’ and its most striking feature is ‘it’s very high level of formal organization’. Elucidating this formulation Lodge sates that the extreme positions taken by Marxists ‘that art should have a content’, and by Structuralists that ‘art should be something which is itself of great beauty’ reveals only half-truth: the truth lies somewhere in between because the content of literature is as important as our insistence that literature can only be judged in terms of the words of the page. Likewise, the theories of language that appeared in Europe between the sixteenth and twentieth century generally followed the Coleridgean ‘ Semasiological’ stance, that language is to convey not the object alone, but likewise the character, mood and intentions of the person who representing it’. Therefore, the ultimate problem for the reader was to decipher language as a mediating agency between the categories of the mind and the world given to thought in perception. All these views came in for rigorous interrogation and re-evaluation in the 1960’s when post-structuralism replaced structuralism and critics like Foucault, Derrida and Barthes viewed language as constitutive both of the categories and the perceptions contained by it. While reducing “literature to writing, writing to language, and language in a final paroxysm of frustration, to chatter about silence”, they created more confusion than they essayed to solve it. What this confusion is and how they confuse the reader, depriving him of enjoying literature, will form the main parabola of this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. S. Karthik Kumar, Muzafar Ahmad Bhat

Keywords

Related Articles

Elements of the Metaphysical Detective in Melville’s The Confidence-Man: Questioning the Notion of Evidence

In the Melville’s Confidence-Man will be taken as a starting-point for presenting these themes in 19th century literature. As will become clear, the novel has very little in common with traditional detective stories. The...

Father –Son Relationship in Arthur Miller’s ALL MY SONS

Father-Son relationship is Miller’s most favourite theme. He portrays this relationship excellently in his plays. His plays deal with the father’s duties and dreams as well as the son’s expectations and aspirations .The...

The Use of Free web Resource for the Learning of English Language

In the present article the researcher has tried to make an attempt how free web resources and computer literacy can be useful to the students of learning English at their graduation level. The students learn English in t...

Despondency and Dormancy: The Stifled Voice in the Select Poems of Philip Levine

Man is a social animal and not a machine who can lead a lonely life in the midst of a madding crowd. One of the basic needs of man is the urge to communicate. This is true not only in the case of man but almost every l...

Depictionof the Invisbilizedin Mahesh Dattani’s Seven Steps Around the Fire

The term ‘hijras’ has no dignified position in our society.They are on the fringes of the society and pale into insignificance. Since they are not welcomed , protected and secured from the prejudices of the people o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP522235
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. S. Karthik Kumar, Muzafar Ahmad Bhat (2017). Post-Structuralist Aesthetics and the Paradoxical Nature of Language. Notions A Journal of English Literature, 0(2), 82-90. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-522235