Powstanie Republiki Czechosłowackiej po I wojnie światowej i znaczenie rewolucyjnego Zgromadzenia Narodowego w tym procesie

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2019, Vol 150, Issue 1

Abstract

Soon after the First World War broke out in 1914, both in the country and abroad a movement was formed aimed at establishing an independent Czecho-Slovak state. It was hoped that Austria-Hungary would collapse and Germany be defeated. To reach its goal, the independence movement had to obtain the support of Czechs and Slovaks abroad, mainly in the USA, France and Russia, as well as benevolence of the Entente Powers. Initially, the decisive influence of Russia was taken into consideration, which resulted in the postulate to preserve monarchy. As Russia’s position was weakening, the Czecho-Slovak resistance movement became more oriented towards Entente’s western powers and gradually, especially abroad, emphasized the vision of the future state as a republic and its democratic system. In order to understand the establishment of the Revolutionary National Assembly in Prague in 1918, the origin of its founding must be presented and a reference made to Austro-Hungarian parliamentarism. On 19 November 1916 information was published on founding the Czech Union comprising Deputies of the Austrian Parliament — the Imperial Council (Reichsrat) in Vienna. It was a group of Deputies of nine political parties, who committed themselves to act in accordance with the principle of majority in national-political and constitutional-legal matters. Simultaneously, the National Committee was founded as a permanent body associating representatives of Czech political parties. It was to support the Czech Union as the highest authority in those matters of political life that transgressed competences of Deputies to the parliament. Initially, the Czech Union was loyal to the Austrian government and even distanced itself from the Czecho-Slovak resistance movement abroad. Among the Czechs important organizational elements were established, which contributed to the creation of the union and became a catalyst of the Czech political life.

Authors and Affiliations

Róbert Letz

Keywords

Related Articles

W sprawie obowiązku udzielania posłom informacji przez przedstawicieli organów państwowych

The opinion refers to a number of problems related to the statutory obligation to provide Deputies with information by representatives of state organs. The most important of the analyzed issues is the matter of legal mea...

Konstytucja kwietniowa i konstytucje republikańskich państw autorytarnych w międzywojennej Europie. Próba porównania — wybrane zagadnienia (część II)

The article deals with the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 23 April 1935 as compared with constitutions of the authoritarian states of interwar Europe, which were republics. The scope of the a...

Trybunał Konstytucyjny w sporze z prezydentem, rządem i parlamentem w 2015 r.

Analyzed herein is the Constitutional Tribunal’s judgment of 3 December 2015 (ref. no. K 34/15). The Tribunal considered the issue of consistence with the Constitution of provisions of the act on the Constitutional Tribu...

O mniej znanych kontrowersjach prawnych związanych z przyjęciem Konstytucji kwietniowej z 1935 r.

The author discusses the problems associated with legal irregularities accompanied by the adoption of the “April Constitution”. Paying particular attention to the fact that, in accordance with Art. 125 of its predecessor...

Znaczenie zawarcia w rocie ślubowania niektórych funkcjonariuszy publicznych słów „Tak mi dopomóż Bóg” w prawie polskim i prawie kanonicznym

A vow is a ceremonial oath, by which a person taking the offi ce pledges to abide by the social and national values named therein. In most cases, an oath may be taken with the additional sentence “So help me God”. It con...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP563092
  • DOI 10.31268/PS.2019.07
  • Views 33
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Róbert Letz (2019). Powstanie Republiki Czechosłowackiej po I wojnie światowej i znaczenie rewolucyjnego Zgromadzenia Narodowego w tym procesie. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 150(1), 111-135. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-563092