Practice of the European Court of human rights concerning violation of the right of confrontation and problemming of the implementation of article 6 (d) in Ukraine's criminal proceedings

Journal Title: Альманах міжнародного права - Year 2018, Vol 19, Issue

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of realization of pp. d p 3 p. 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950, incl. in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine. It is noted that the ECtHR is very carefully suited to each particular case, assessing, depending on its circumstances, whether or not there has been a violation of Article D. part 3. 6 of the Convention. Important in this case are the following provisions: was the witness who could not be questioned, the key and the role of his testimony to the case; the reasons why it was impossible to question the witness; whether the verdict is lawful and substantiated without this proof; how much this evidence is reliable and consistent with others; was the applicant able to challenge the admissibility of this evidence and whether the court examined the admissibility issue; what were the conditions for the study of evidence in court and how limited the protection possibilities were during the trial; whether the parties had equal procedural opportunities. The author examines the provisions of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine in relation to the implementation of the right of confrontation, and proposes to amend ch. 9 of Art. 224 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, pointing out that simultaneous interrogation of two and the pain of interrogated persons to establish the reasons for the disagreement in their testimony may be conducted with the participation of a juvenile or minor witness or victim together with the suspect on the initiative of a juvenile or minor witness or victim.

Authors and Affiliations

І. В. МУДРАК

Keywords

Related Articles

Dynamic interpretation of fundamental human rights and freedoms in the European Convention on Human Rights

The guarantees enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights are a minimum standard. The European Court of Human Rights doesn’t define, how exactly the States must secure these rights. Thus, the member States en...

Assessment of Transnational Threats Organized Crime

The article deals with a comprehensive analytical report by the United Nations (UN) Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) on «Transnational Organized Crime and its Threats». The author defines the fundamental directions of c...

International criminality of torture: а global dimension

The article investigates the problem of the effectiveness of international law in the fight against crime and terrorism, torture, human rights provide opportunities in a global conflict, especially as regards the prohibi...

On the issue of the statutory procedures request and receive agrement: historical experience and present

The requests and receiving agrement interest outstanding diplomat H. Nichol- son, E. Satou, J. Cambon, R.J. Felthem. Their work does not lose relevance. Continue to be regard- ed as a valuable source of diplomatic practi...

Displaying Legal Ideas of I. I. Lukashuk in Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Attempts to codify the law of international treaties, the peculiarities of the adoption of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the contribution of the well-known domestic international scientist Igor Ivanovy...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP657711
  • DOI -
  • Views 51
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

І. В. МУДРАК (2018). Practice of the European Court of human rights concerning violation of the right of confrontation and problemming of the implementation of article 6 (d) in Ukraine's criminal proceedings. Альманах міжнародного права, 19(), 64-73. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-657711