Prawa i Sprawiedliwości krytyka Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r.

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 147, Issue 4

Abstract

The article refers to the position of the Law and Justice party as regards the Polish fundamental law, in force since 1997. Diagnosing the constitution, Law and Justice politicians pointed to its fl aws and provisions resulting in the systemic weakness of the state. The diagnosis comprised four problematic areas: circumstances (origin) of the passing of the Constitution of 1997, criticism of axiological foundations and systemic regulations, as well as legal systemic effects of constitutional provisions. Questioning a relevant part of Poland’s systemic achievements after 1989, Law and Justice saw the need for fundamental changes in almost all spheres of political and social life. The party’s answer to the multi-sphere state crisis was the project of the Fourth Republic of Poland, signifying a radical reconstruction of the state. The basis for the proposed changes was to be the new constitution. Law and Justice’s idea of “the good constitution” expressed the will to found a strong, independent state, which would “play the role of a depositary of values and historic heritage”. The party’s views on the Constitution of the Third Republic of Poland were in line with the broader project of building a strong state. There dominated the view that “democratic” or “liberal” values cannot serve to specify the ideological foundations of social and political order. The priority was to clearly define the anticommunist identity and to found modernization of the state on tradition.

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Sanecka-Tyczyńska

Keywords

Related Articles

Instytucja Prezydenta RP według Jarosława Kaczyńskiego i w projektach konstytucji Prawa i Sprawiedliwości

From the Jarosław Kaczyński’s address to the constitutional convention of the Law and Justice (PiS) party, and from the constitutional proposals put forward by PIS, it is clear that they are not in any way intended to ra...

Legislatywa i egzekutywa w prezydenckich i półprezydenckich systemach rządów

The article deals with the issue of the relationship between the legislative and the executive powers under the presidential and semi-presidential systems of government. The starting point is the following general remark...

Ekstraterytorialne stosowanie Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności (w kontekście wyrokow Wielkiej Izby ETPC z 7 lipca 2011 r. w sprawach Al-Skeini i inni i Al-Jedda v. Wielka Brytania)

The author discusses the extraterritorial application of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the context of the judgments of the Grand Chamber of the ECHR in cases Al-Skeini et a...

Wolność nauki i nauczania oraz autonomia uczelni a jakość naukowa uniwersytetów

The purpose of this article is to confi rm that the length of freedom of science and teaching legal warranty period, as well as the autonomy of the universities in a country, have contributed to the highlevel research. I...

Między jednolitością a podziałem władzy: pozycja ustrojowa Sejmu Ustawodawczego

The purpose of the article is to determine the systemic position of the Legislative Sejm functioning between 1919 and 1922. The Sejm’s output is considered significant due to the fact that the terminated continuity of Po...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP407470
  • DOI 10.31268/PS.2018.06
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna Sanecka-Tyczyńska (2018). Prawa i Sprawiedliwości krytyka Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r.. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 147(4), 75-88. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-407470