Prawa i Sprawiedliwości krytyka Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r.

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2018, Vol 147, Issue 4

Abstract

The article refers to the position of the Law and Justice party as regards the Polish fundamental law, in force since 1997. Diagnosing the constitution, Law and Justice politicians pointed to its fl aws and provisions resulting in the systemic weakness of the state. The diagnosis comprised four problematic areas: circumstances (origin) of the passing of the Constitution of 1997, criticism of axiological foundations and systemic regulations, as well as legal systemic effects of constitutional provisions. Questioning a relevant part of Poland’s systemic achievements after 1989, Law and Justice saw the need for fundamental changes in almost all spheres of political and social life. The party’s answer to the multi-sphere state crisis was the project of the Fourth Republic of Poland, signifying a radical reconstruction of the state. The basis for the proposed changes was to be the new constitution. Law and Justice’s idea of “the good constitution” expressed the will to found a strong, independent state, which would “play the role of a depositary of values and historic heritage”. The party’s views on the Constitution of the Third Republic of Poland were in line with the broader project of building a strong state. There dominated the view that “democratic” or “liberal” values cannot serve to specify the ideological foundations of social and political order. The priority was to clearly define the anticommunist identity and to found modernization of the state on tradition.

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Sanecka-Tyczyńska

Keywords

Related Articles

Glosa do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego Stanow Zjednoczonych z dnia 4 czerwca 2018 r. w sprawie Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

The discussed judgment refers to the problem of law prohibiting the discrimination in access to goods and services. Colorado Rights Commission, and then the Colorado Court of Appeal decided that the bakery owner Jack Phi...

Uprawnienia organów władzy wykonawczej w zakresie zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa państwa

State security and related issues are becoming increasingly important in the modern world. In this case, an interesting issue is to analyze it from the perspective of Constitution of Poland of 2 April 1997. The powers of...

Współpraca parlamentów narodowych z Parlamentem Europejskim w zakresie tworzenia prawa

The article presents relations between parliaments of the European Union Member States (Poland, France, Sweden) and the European Parliament, from the perspective of the few years that had passed since the Treaty of Lisbo...

Skarga nadzwyczajna — dopełniający czy konkurencyjny wobec skargi konstytucyjnej instrument ochrony konstytucyjnych wolności i praw jednostki.

On 3 April 2018, a new law on the Supreme Court went into force, introducing a new institution — an extraordinary complaint. According to the intention of its authors, the construction of extraordinary complaint emphasis...

Uwagi Maurycego Zdzisława Jaroszyńskiego o ustroju Polski po śmierci marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego

The study recalls an unknown statement by Maurycy Jaroszyński from the time of the war, containing an analysis of the government of 1926–1939. This opinion is critical, and its justification shows the incompatibility of...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP407470
  • DOI 10.31268/PS.2018.06
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Joanna Sanecka-Tyczyńska (2018). Prawa i Sprawiedliwości krytyka Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z 1997 r.. PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY, 147(4), 75-88. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-407470