Problematyka prawa wyborczego do ciał przedstawicielskich w pracach ustrojowych Sejmu II kadencji w okresie od 31 października 1928 r. do 6 lutego 1929 r.
Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SEJMOWY - Year 2015, Vol 126, Issue 1
Abstract
The process of changing the Constitution of March 17, 1921 was launched in the Sejm of the 2nd term on 31 October 1928. On that day, Walery Sławek, president of the Nonpartisan Bloc for Cooperation with the Government (BBWR), proposed that the Board adopted a resolution to initiate the revision of the basic law. This issue has become the subject of the debate, first, at the Constitutional Committee (November–December 1928) and, then, in the plenary session of the Sejm (January 1929). During this period, the Deputies discussed and voted the procedures for the intended reform of the system of government. The decisions taken have acted as a catalyst for further legislative work. As a consequence, on 6 February 1929., BBWR submitted to the Sejm a draft revision of the March Constitution. The solutions contained therein, even if important, did not affect the basic mechanisms of creation of the Sejm and the Senate. Their scope and extent were limited, and the changes proposed point by point. The criticized principle of equal suffrage has not been deconstitutionalized. The concept of completing the composition of the Senate with the President’s appointees increased the ability to infl uence the functioning of parliament by the executive branch. However, in the face of radical proposals formulated by the Sanacja in the summer of 1928, it only partly realized the expectations then articulated. This fact confi rms the assumption that the rationalization of the system of elections to representative bodies, as opposed to the issue of strengthening political institutions forming the executive, has not been a BBWR’s priority.
Authors and Affiliations
Kamil Kacperski
Zarządzenia Prezesa Rady Ministrów wydane w celu utworzenia rad i zespołów opiniodawczych lub doradczych w sprawach należących do zadań i kompetencji Rady Ministrów lub premiera
The article provides an analysis of executive orders of the Prime Minister issued on the basis of Article 12 para. 1 subpara. 3 and para. 2 of the Act of 8 August 1996 on the Council of Ministers. These are acts of inter...
Państwo prawa w klasycznej tradycji zachodniej i późnej nowoczesności w kontekście sporów wokół klauzuli demokratycznego państwa prawnego
The purpose of the article is to indicate the possible directions for clarifying the modern model of a state both democratic and ruled by law. To seriously take those two qualities, they must be regarded as mutually rela...
Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa XXIII Zjazd Katedr Teorii i Filozofii Prawa „Państwo — Społeczeństwo — Kultura: formalne i nieformalne źródła prawa”, Lublin, 23–26 września 2018 r.
The report refers to the All-Poland Scientific Conference held on 23–26 September 2018, organized by the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law at the Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration of the John Paul II...
Uzasadnienie dynamicznej wykładni Konwencji o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności — pytania krytyczne
In the light of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is a living instrument “which must be interpreted in the light of present-day...
Modele pozaparlamentarnej kontroli konstytucyjności prawa
The article presents models of extra-parliamentary constitutional review of law. The starting point is the methodological discussion of various concepts of the division and types of review, i.a. political vs judicial, st...