Problems in the Implementation of Mortgage Rights Based on Law No. 4 of 1996 Concerning Mortgage Rights
Journal Title: International Journal of Social Science And Human Research - Year 2024, Vol 7, Issue 08
Abstract
After the enactment of Law No. 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights (hereinafter referred to as UUHT), the provisions for the execution of Mortgage Rights are regulated under Article 20 of UUHT, which provides three alternative methods that creditors can use to execute the collateral object of the mortgage in the event of a debtor's default. These methods are: 1) parate executie, 2) execution based on the executorial title contained in the Mortgage Certificate, and 3) sale by private treaty. These steps can be taken if the debtor is in breach of contract. However, in practice, these mechanisms need to be reviewed in greater depth to determine whether they can be implemented, as Article 26 stipulates that 'as long as no regulations are enacted, the execution shall refer to the provisions regarding the execution of hypothec existing at the time of the enactment of this Law.' The term 'regulations to be enacted' should refer to 'Government Regulations' (as implementing regulations of the law), and the 'provisions regarding the execution of hypothec existing at the time of the enactment of this Law' as explained in Article 26 of UUHT refers to Article 224 of the HIR, which stipulates that bodily coercion can only be carried out after being authorized by a court decision. This creates practical problems, leading some to argue that even though the execution of Mortgage Rights is regulated under Article 20 of UUHT, in the absence of 'Government Regulations' (as further implementing regulations concerning the execution of mortgage rights under the Mortgage Law), any public sale (auction) of the object of mortgage rights must still go through the fiat of the Chief Judge of the Court as stipulated in Article 224 of the HIR. On the other hand, some believe that the fiat of the Chief Judge of the Court as stipulated in Article 224 of the HIR is unnecessary, as Article 20 of UUHT already provides for parate executie, which can serve as an alternative in the execution of Mortgage Rights, allowing the creditor to directly apply for auction without a court fiat.
Authors and Affiliations
Rendhi Widodo Poetra, Yunanto
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP743540
- DOI 10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-110
- Views 22
- Downloads 0
Suryanamaskara is an Effective Practice for Overall Health Management: A Preliminary Review Study
Background: With the increased physical inactivity and extreme demand for yogic culture worldwide, the author emphasized particularly one of the main yogic activities namely suryanamaskara (SN), or sun salutation, which...
Determinants Capital Structure of Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia
This research aims to analyze the determinants of capital structure. The independent variables in this study are corporate taxes, company size, tangible assets, corporate risk, profitability, non-debt tax protection, and...
Analysis of Employee Job Satisfaction in the Public Service Sector
The quality of public services will be implemented optimally if employees at the agency feel satisfaction at work. Several indicators can be used to measure employee satisfaction, namely: the job itself, salary, promotio...
Teacher-Parent Collaborative Mentoring Practices on Scholastic Success of Learners
This study explores parental involvement in the modular learning of high school students, focusing on challenges faced, teacher interventions, and the perceived benefits of teacher-parent mentoring. Through in-depth inte...
Identity Transformation among Diasporic Women Characters in Americanah
This article scrutinizes the impact of hybridity, cultural identity, and diaspora on the self-identity of African women immigrants and their interactions with others in Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah (2013), and N...