Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 13/15

Journal Title: Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych - Year 2015, Vol 48, Issue 4

Abstract

In the proposed draft position the author states that the Sejm does not share the belief of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights that the provisions of Article 12 § 1 and § 2 of the Family and Guardianship Code violate the Constitution in that they lead to humilia‑ tion and a justified sense of grievance of people affected by their operation. It has been shown that in this case the law is not a source of harm to the individual, on the contrary – the adopted regulations are aimed at protecting constitutional values, with maximum respect for the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities. In the opinion of the author of the draft position, it cannot be found that the arguments of the Commissioner for Citizens’ Rights – referring generally to social degradation of people affected by mental disabilities, without taking into account the details of construct of marriage ban – meets the high standards required by the Constitutional Tribunal. According to the author, from the considerations contained in the draft position it follows that the above-men‑tioned provision of the Code is compatible with Article 30 of the Constitution.

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Brzozowski

Keywords

Related Articles

Opinia na temat wymogów wynikających z prawa Unii Europejskiej dotyczących terminu uchwalenia projektu ustawy – Prawo wodne, konsekwencji jego nieuchwalenia i związanych z tym kosztów, którymi może być obciążona Rzeczpospolita Polska

According to the bill, the act should enter into force on 1st of July 2017, although without certain articles, which are supposed to enter into force later. In case of a non-adoption of the act the European Commission ca...

Wykładnia art. 47 ust. 2 pkt 1 regulaminu Sejmu – tryb rozpatrywania poprawek w komisjach

The analysis concerns the issue of whether a committee considering, based on the indicated provision, amendments submitted during the second reading, should vote on their acceptance or rejection separately for each amend...

Opinia na temat wniosku dotyczącego decyzji Rady w sprawie zawarcia w imieniu Unii Europejskiej Konwencji Narodów Zjednoczonych dotyczącej przejrzystości w umownych postępowaniach arbitrażowych między inwestorem a państwem [COM(2015) 20 final]

The opinion concerns spreading the use and extending the substantive and temporal scope of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treatybased Investor-State Arbitration. Possible conflict of obligations of Member States u...

Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt SK 39/15

This draft position of the Sejm con‑ cerns the constitutional complaint of 7 July 2015. In the proposed draft position the author claims that the contested Article 136 paras. 3 and 4 of the Act on Real Property Managemen...

Reforma źródeł przychodów jako warunek konieczny przebudowy obecnego modelu opodatkowania dochodów

The article is devoted to the reform of the current income taxation model concerning natural and legal persons. It outlines the origin, structure and faults of the system having been in force for almost 30-years, referri...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP311460
  • DOI -
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Wojciech Brzozowski (2015). Projekt stanowiska Sejmu w sprawie o sygn. akt K 13/15. Zeszyty Prawnicze Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 48(4), 288-308. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-311460