Propofol or Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion-A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 7

Abstract

Induction agents were proposed. This study attempts to compare effects of propofol and sevoflurane with the help of an accepted scoring system. We conducted this prospective study at SAT hospital government medical college Trivandrum after ethics committee clearance. The inclusion criteria were pediatric patients aged 3 to 12 years, of ASA grade, I and II, undergoing various surgical procedures such as such as herniotomy, circumcision, urethroplasty and lower limb surgeries. Exclusion criteria were those at increased risk of aspiration, with difficult airway, history of convulsions and ISL. This study had a sample size of 25 each patient selected randomly in the two groups namely propofol group and sevoflurane group. Details about basic demographic features and components of the scoring systems were collected in a pretested case report form. All statistical analyses were done in R statistical environment. Study had more males compared to female. The heart rate was 104± 3.88 (S.D.). The median blood pressure was 110(108;110)mm Hg. The mean weight was 14(13;16). Total score for Propofol showed- poor 7 (28%), satisfactory 15 (60%) and excellent 3 (12%). Regarding Sevoflurane, the scores were - poor 12 (48%), satisfactory 9 (36%) and excellent 4 (16%). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups when the total scores were compared (p value <0.05). The result of study showed that Propofol and Sevoflurane fulfill many of the characteristics of an ideal induction agent for LMA insertion in pediatric patients which include rapid smooth induction, smooth maintenance, minimum side effects, not much post operative complications and no cardiorespiratory side effects. Both 1% Propofol and Sevoflurane are excellent agents as induction agents for the LMA insertion in paediatric patients. Considering the parameters in the scoring system, Propofol is superior to Sevoflurane.Thus, from this study the conclusion is that propofol is a better induction agent for LMA insertion in paediatric patients compared to Sevoflurane and results are coinciding with that of other studies

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Harikumar. C. K

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of Vascular Causes of Cognitive Dysfunction in Geriatric Patients

Introduction: Prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in patient attending the hospital is remarkably higher (31.53%) than in general population (3.5%).Many, often treatable, cognitive dysfunction cases are taken complacentl...

Lymph Node Staging in Patients of Head & Neck Malignancies with Clinically Negative Neck Examinations by Ultrasound and Ultrasound Guided Aspiration Cytology

Head and neck cancer is very common with incidence rates varying from 10-15% in various sociodemographic regions and approximately 50% of all malignant tumours in males in India. More than 90% of head neck cancers are sq...

Rhinosporidiosis of Penile Shaft: A Rare Case Report

Rhinosporidiosis is a chronic granulomatous disease caused by Rhinosporidium seeberi (earlier described as a fungus, now reclassified in its own class Mesomycetozoea). India and Sri Lanka are the endemic regions for rhin...

Cytogenetic Study in Couples with Primary Infertility

Fertility denotes the ability of a man and woman to reproduce. Conversely, infertility denotes lack of fertility, an involuntary reduction in the ability to produce children. A total of thirty three couples were studied...

Impact of Marital Status on Mental Health of Working Women

Mental health can be defined as the ability to make adequate social and emotional adjustments to the environment, on the plane of reality. Mental health of working women was assessed in the present study. Marital status...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP526804
  • DOI -
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Harikumar. C. K (2017). Propofol or Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion-A Comparative Study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(7), 25044-25048. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-526804