Prospective Comparison of Pressor and Airway Responses to IV Esmolol and IV Dexmedetomidine during Emergence from General Anaesthesia and Extubation

Journal Title: Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Tracheal extubation causes significant hemodynamic stimulation resulting in transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate. Aim and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine given intravenously to attenuate the pressor and airway response to emergence from general anaesthesia and tracheal extubation. Materials and Methods: After obtaining institutional ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 90 ASA grade I and II patients, in the age group of 20-70 years, of either sex, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included. At the end of surgery, patients received IV Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg (Group E) two minutes prior to extubation or IV Dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg (Group D) over ten minutes prior to extubation or no drug in the control group (Group C). Hemodynamic parameters were assessed before giving study drugs, before extubation and after extubation upto 15 minutes. Extubation quality was rated using 5 point cough grading. Sedation scoring was done using Modified Ramsay Sedation scale. Results: All hemodynamic parameters showed attenuation upto 15 minutes post extubation, in both Group E and Group D as compared to Group C. However, even though Injection Esmolol successfully controlled the hemodynamic response to extubation, the attenuation was more evident with Injection Dexmedetomidine, as the parameters were below the baseline values at all times after extubation, without excessive bradycardia or hypotension. None of the patients showed incidence of desaturation. The cough grading, and hence the quality of extubation, was better with Group D as compared to Group C and E. Patients in the Dexmedetomidine group, were significantly sedated as compared to Esmolol and Control group, but this aided a smooth extubation without any agitation. Conclusion: We conclude that IV Esmolol 1.5 mg/kg attenuates the pressor response, but IV Dexmedetomidine attenuates both pressor as well as the airway responses to extubation.

Authors and Affiliations

Malvika Prasad Tendulkar, Sanjot Sudhir Ninave

Keywords

Related Articles

Combination of Midazolam and Butorphanol for Sedation for Tympanoplasty under Monitored Anaesthesia Care  

Background: Tympanoplasty is routinely done under local anaesthesia with sedation due to various advantages. Systemic analgesics and sedatives are generally given to improve the patient comfort. Aim & Objectives:...

Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomedine versus Clonidine as an Adjuvant in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Background: Supraclavicular block is considered to be the ideal block for upper extremity surgeries as it provides ideal operative conditions by complete muscle relaxation and stable intra operative hemodynamics. Aim and...

 Study of Changes in Knowledge of Primary Health Care among Medical Interns Attending the Community Medicine Posting

Background: Internship is the best period foracquiring practical knowledge and skills in communitymedicine to become a successful primaryhealth care physician. Effectiveness ofinternship has been questioned in many resea...

Euthanasia and Death with Dignity  

Dying has become imposition upon humans, who seek to avoid it as they encounter the inevitably fatal aging process. After the case of Aruna Shanbag a nurse who spent 42 years in a vegetative state as a result of sexua...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP228115
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Malvika Prasad Tendulkar, Sanjot Sudhir Ninave (2017). Prospective Comparison of Pressor and Airway Responses to IV Esmolol and IV Dexmedetomidine during Emergence from General Anaesthesia and Extubation. Journal of Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences University, 6(1), 49-56. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-228115