RATING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: A STEP CLOSER TO THE FUTURE?

Abstract

Today we have almost everything at the tip of our fingers, or to be more precise, just one click away. Whether calling a cab, ordering food, making a reservation or booking a flight, you just have to log onto an online platform, and you are settled. The great thing is that, after the service is provided, you can - and are encouraged - to leave a comment speaking you mind, praising or complaining, with valid arguments. Imagine a “platform” where you can not only leave a review of a restaurant, but a “platform” where you can even “rate” the quality of the judicial proceedings by some given criteria’s involving the court (waiting room, courtroom’s space, public timetable), the court’s clerks (manners, efficiency) or, why not, the judges (law knowledge, duration of the process, commitment and celerity). Would this be an infringement to the judge’s independency, or would it bring a benefit to the judicial system by making the judges more aware of how their court decisions affect the people involved in their rulings? This study is intended to create awareness on the modern changes that can be seen as challenges associated with the benefits or downsides of using the online platforms in the judicial system. The objective is to provide some practical and deontological recommendation which the Superior Council of Magistracy and the National Association of Bars might consider to include (if relevant to the circumstances of their respective jurisdiction) in guidance to their members. Besides highlighting some deontological considerations, this study also explains the challenges that are of a more technical nature, including those related to maintaining the independency of the judge, the security of personal information and those related to specific ways that a “rate” given can be categorised as being accurate or being given in bad faith.

Authors and Affiliations

Livia DIANU-BUJA, Cristian Paul LOSPA

Keywords

Related Articles

LOCAL TAXES IN BULGARIA- A SOURCE OF REVENUES IN THE MUNICIPALITY BUDGETS

Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria were adopted in 2007 and Article 141 empowered the municipal councils to determine the amount of local taxes under the conditions and within the limits establish...

HORROR VACUI: THE MEANING CRISIS OF THE GLOBALIZED WORLD (THE CASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION). A JUNGIAN APPROACH

In its widest acceptation, globalization amounts to a progressive ‘interdependentization’ of the various areas, levels and regions of human civilization. On account of globalization we are much more prone to becoming one...

CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF EUROPEAN UNION: A VISIT TO THE WINE CELLAR

`It must be observed that a quality wine is a very specific product. Its particular qualities and characteristics, which result from a combination of natural and human factors, are linked to its geographical area of orig...

QUALIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS AS NORMATIVE AND INDIVIDUAL ACTS. THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES

The paper aims at analysing the administrative acts of a normative character and the administrative acts of an individual character, provided for in art. 2 par. (1) letter c) of the Law on the administrative contentious...

PROPERTY AND FREE INITIATIVE IN ECONOMY

The property is a subject that has been and it is studied by specialists from the economics, philosophy, law, history fields etc. It is natural to be a subject of attraction since the property is an essential preconditio...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590397
  • DOI -
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Livia DIANU-BUJA, Cristian Paul LOSPA (2019). RATING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: A STEP CLOSER TO THE FUTURE?. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 533-537. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590397