RATING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: A STEP CLOSER TO THE FUTURE?

Abstract

Today we have almost everything at the tip of our fingers, or to be more precise, just one click away. Whether calling a cab, ordering food, making a reservation or booking a flight, you just have to log onto an online platform, and you are settled. The great thing is that, after the service is provided, you can - and are encouraged - to leave a comment speaking you mind, praising or complaining, with valid arguments. Imagine a “platform” where you can not only leave a review of a restaurant, but a “platform” where you can even “rate” the quality of the judicial proceedings by some given criteria’s involving the court (waiting room, courtroom’s space, public timetable), the court’s clerks (manners, efficiency) or, why not, the judges (law knowledge, duration of the process, commitment and celerity). Would this be an infringement to the judge’s independency, or would it bring a benefit to the judicial system by making the judges more aware of how their court decisions affect the people involved in their rulings? This study is intended to create awareness on the modern changes that can be seen as challenges associated with the benefits or downsides of using the online platforms in the judicial system. The objective is to provide some practical and deontological recommendation which the Superior Council of Magistracy and the National Association of Bars might consider to include (if relevant to the circumstances of their respective jurisdiction) in guidance to their members. Besides highlighting some deontological considerations, this study also explains the challenges that are of a more technical nature, including those related to maintaining the independency of the judge, the security of personal information and those related to specific ways that a “rate” given can be categorised as being accurate or being given in bad faith.

Authors and Affiliations

Livia DIANU-BUJA, Cristian Paul LOSPA

Keywords

Related Articles

THE REFERENDUM, REFLECTED IN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT'S CASE LAW

The referendum is the main instrument of direct democracy, a means of consultation by which the People has the possibility to directly exercise national sovereignty. In Romania, the referendum has to be organized every t...

LIFTING THE VEIL OF THE GDPR TO DATA SUBJECTS

Every natural person is entitled to personal data protection regardless of his or her nationality, residence, race, age, gender, language, religion, political and other affiliations, ethnicity, social background and stat...

CONTROL ACTIVITY CARRIED OUT BY THE PREFECT. ROLE, MISSION, PERSPECTIVES

The prerogative of the control constitutes an efficient instrument in achieving managerial objectives at all levels and in all fields of activity and, by virtue of the professional experience that I have acquired, I have...

CONTRIBUTION OF EVA LEVERAGE TO THE TOTAL LEVERAGE EFFECT ON THE COMPANY

The concept of Economic Value Added (EVA) and Market Value Added (MVA) has opened up new insights into the leverage effect of fixed costs (operational leverage) and interest (financial leverage), and for determining what...

THE REGIME OF THE LETTER OF GUARANTEE UNDER THE ROMANIAN LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PROVISIONS

The letter of guarantee is widely utilized in the international trade relations and its regime was regulated through three publications issued by the International Chamber of Commerce from Paris (Publication no.325, Publ...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP590397
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Livia DIANU-BUJA, Cristian Paul LOSPA (2019). RATING THE LEGAL SYSTEM: A STEP CLOSER TO THE FUTURE?. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 11(13), 533-537. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-590397