REASON AND CONDITIONS OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE REALIZATION OF REPRESENTATION FUNCTION IN THE COURT

Abstract

The article highlights the results of theoretical and legal search towards finding out the essence of the concepts of «reason» and «conditions» in the context of setting preconditions for realization of the prosecutor’s office function of representation of interests of the citizen or the state in the court. Found that the basis prosecutor’s office function of representation of interests of the citizen or the state in the court consist of normative and actual constituents and appropriate conditions for realization of the prosecutor’s office function of representation of interests of the citizen or the state in the court proposed to include: condition of subjective membership; condition of defect of legal protection mechanism for the public interest; condition of jurisdictional authorizing of public prosecutor’s office representation in court; condition of «quasi-suitor» status for prosecutor, if confirmed by the court grounds of representation. The main factor – the basis on which all activity of prosecutor’s office of Ukraine is based is the task of realization of the constitutional functions for the purpose of protection of the rights and freedoms of the person, interests of society and the state. Therefore, in this case it is about a standard legal ground of representation prosecutor’s office of interests of the citizen or the state in court. However, despite importance of a standard component, it is necessary, but insufficient. This basis can be recognized as the purpose basis, however without existence of the real actual basis the mechanism of realization of function of representation cannot be “started”. Therefore, according to the author, prosecutor’s office of interests of the citizen or the state in court it is necessary to understand potentially existing threat or the fact of defeat of public interest as the actual foundation of representation. At the same time the author understands such its state at which it suffered (or can suffer) the narrowing or destruction or when the legal mechanism of its realization and/or protection was narrowed or destroyed as “defeat” of such public interest. The fact that such state has to be caused, as a rule, by guilty illegal behavior is important here too. Giving of the status of “quasi-party” of process to it has to become one of conditions of effective representation the prosecutor of interests of the citizen or the state in court. The author pays attention that confirmation by court of existence of the bases for representation at the same time means establishment and confirmation by court of the fact of non-execution or inadequate execution by lawful representatives of interests of the citizen or the state of the obligations for their protection for this reason the prosecutor initiates production for the benefit of the corresponding citizen or the state and, in case of confirmation by court of existence of the bases for representation, uses procedural powers of the relevant party in process. According to the author, in such conditions only the prosecutor on such affairs has to act as the representative of interests of the citizen or the state, acquiring the procedural status of “quasi-party” of process. As the admission in process of representatives who do not execute or it is inadequate fulfill the duties on protection of interests of the citizen or the state that is confirmed with court, in case of the admission of the prosecutor in process as the participant who uses procedural powers of the party, it seems unjustified and leads to the procedural indemnity competition

Authors and Affiliations

M. M. Stefanchuk

Keywords

Related Articles

CONCEPTUAL PROBLEMS OF DEFINITION OF ESSENCE OF CONCEPTS «EXTERNAL-INTERNAL» STATE SECURITY

The article explores the problem of establishing specific objects of crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine in the context of the current criminal legislation and taking into account the provisions of t...

GENESIS OF THE NATIONAL PREVENTIVE MECHANISM IN INDEPENDENT UKRAINE

The subject of the research in the article is the development and establishment of a national preventive mechanism for the prevention of torture and ill-treatment in places of detention. The chronology of the development...

Issues of copyright enforcement in the digital environment: p2p networking and darknet

This article will provide a basic overview of the P2P Networking, its development into darknet, and the legal aspects and means of copyright enforcement will be analyzed. Furthermore, the correlation between copyright an...

STATE CONTROL IN CONSTRUCTION: CURRENT REALITIES

The article is devoted to topical issues related to the implementation of state control in the sphere of construction. Analyzed the practical problems that have a significant impact on the functioning mechanisms of the s...

EVOLUTION OF THE CONTRACT AS THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE PUBLIC RELATIONS’ CHANGE

The purpose of this article is the research of development of the contract and finishing a position that it is the major case for emergence of the civil rights and duties, the arrangement of the parties directed to estab...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP327410
  • DOI -
  • Views 78
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

M. M. Stefanchuk (2016). REASON AND CONDITIONS OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE REALIZATION OF REPRESENTATION FUNCTION IN THE COURT. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Правознавство, 21(1), 69-78. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-327410