Regarding the specific issues of jurisdiction, admissibility of evidence and the start of pre-trial investigation
Journal Title: Право та державне управління - Year 2017, Vol 1, Issue
Abstract
This publication analyzes the issues that were mooring the Prosecutor General of Ukraine to the National Law University scientists Yaroslav the Wise, and provides answers. Putting questions were grouped into three groups: 1) on the Institute jurisdiction; 2) on the individual characteristics of the admissibility of evidence; 3) on the beginning of the pretrial investigation.
Authors and Affiliations
В. В. Вапнярчук
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP451177
- DOI -
- Views 79
- Downloads 0
The legal awareness of citizens is the combating to the corruption risks in the area of land relations
This article was written for the purpose of legal education of citizens in the area of land relations with the main focus on the confrontation of corruption on the part of officials in state and local government bodies...
Objectively wrongful act: the way of structural and complex understanding
The article is devoted to complex and structural analysis of understanding of objectively wrongful act. The basic types of objectively wrongful acts: the acts of the subjects who don’t have a delictual ability and the...
Methodology of Evaluation of Efficiency of State Management Quality of Life
The article reveals the correlation between the efficiency of state management and quality of life of the population; analyzes the approaches to assessing the effectiveness of the public administration; it defines the es...
Classification of lottery areas research methods
In this scientific article the theoretical kinds of methods are approaches. Defined methodological approach of research lottery sector. Reveals the classification of research methods lottery areas.
The systematization of public authority subjects exercising control over courts and judges activities
The article is devoted to systematization of public authority subjects, exercising control over activities of courts and judges.