Religion, group threat and sacred values

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 2

Abstract

Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be more likely than another to hold a sacred value. We present evidence that participation in religious ritual and perceived threat to the group lead people to be more likely to consider preferences as protected or sacred values. Specifically, three studies carried out with Americans and Palestinians show: (a) that the more people participate in religious ritual the more likely they are to report a preference to be a sacred value (Studies 1–3); (b) that people claim more sacred values when they are reminded of religious ritual (Study 2); and (c) that the effect of religious ritual on the likelihood of holding a sacred value is amplified by the perception of high threat to the in-group (Study 3). We discuss implications of these findings for understanding intergroup conflicts, and suggest avenues for future research into the emergence and spread of sacred values.

Authors and Affiliations

Hammad Sheikh, Jeremy Ginges, Alin Coman and Scott Atran

Keywords

Related Articles

Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy

We examine two departures of individual perceptions of randomness from probability theory: the hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy, and their respective opposites. This paper’s first contribution is to use data from the...

Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva

We investigated how frequency and amount of punishment affect the decision making of Iranian subjects. In our first experiment, performing a computer-based Persian version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), our subjects sc...

Anonymity and incentives: An investigation of techniques to reduce socially desirable responding in the Trust Game

Economic games offer a convenient approach for the study of prosocial behavior. As an advantage, they allow for straightforward implementation of different techniques to reduce socially desirable responding. We investiga...

Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor

The authors review their own empirical work inspired by the adaptive toolbox metaphor. The review examines factors influencing strategy selection and execution in multi-attribute inference tasks (e.g., information costs,...

A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies

We conducted an analysis of the 13-item Maximization Scale (Schwartz et al., 2002) with the goal of establishing its factor structure, reliability and validity. We also investigated the psychometric properties of several...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677878
  • DOI -
  • Views 147
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hammad Sheikh, Jeremy Ginges, Alin Coman and Scott Atran (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677878