RELIGIOUS SIMULACRUM – DANGER SYNCRETIC THINKING

Journal Title: Філософські обрії - Year 2016, Vol 35, Issue 35

Abstract

The author comes from the assertion that the era of modernity has led to the erosion of religious culture. The consequence of the latter is to strengthen the syncretism of contemporary post-modern thinking. As a result of rational thinking it was replaced by a return to mythologem characteristic feature of which is logical in the background blur mystical and magical forms of thought that form the sacred simulacra. If such simulacra are starting to turn into a public-private, myths with fused into one political and religious factors. As a result, the ontological topology religion replaced ontical instrumentality. This results in a drastic destruction of religion than it does in the modern era. The roots of this relationship is the lack of philosophical and theological thinking of contemporary Orthodox culture. The crisis of thought at one time to Christianity led to the politicization of religion that, in the end, and shaped an entire era of atheism. In support of the idea of vitality syncretic thinking in modern conditions shows that with the beginning of the religious freedom of the late twentieth century. observed further politicization of Christianity from within. Since the introduction of the concept of «political hesychasm», which at the beginning of the XXI century has become transformed into the concept of «Russian World» – is none other than the religious simulacrum. As a conclusion it should be noted that the religious simulacra – quite tenacious forms of syncretic thinking that shows a lack of philosophical and theological thought and culture of the mental framework of dangerous socio-political conflicts

Authors and Affiliations

Віталій Аркадійович ІГНАТЬЄВ

Keywords

Related Articles

САМОТНІ СВІТИ ЕЖЕНА ІОНЕСКО (ІСТОРИКО-ФІЛОСОФСЬКИЙ АНАЛІЗ)

Проблема абсурду у сучасному поліорганічному світі набуває нових вимірів. Період, коли реальність втрачає свої традиційні кордони і може розглядатися через призму найнелогічніших ознак, як ніколи повертає потребу нового...

FASHION AS A SUBJECT OF SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS: HEURISTIC POTENTIAL

The purpose of the article is the explication of fashion as a subject of socialphilosophical analysis. The thought of modern scientists (G. Lipovetsky, L. Svendsen, A. B. Hoffman, K. Mikhalev, M.A. Kiloshenko) according...

СОЦІАЛІСТИЧНА І БУРЖУАЗНА РЕВОЛЮЦІЇ: МАРКСИЗМ І СЬОГОДЕННЯ (СУЧАСНА ІСТОРИЧНА РЕТРОСПЕКТИВА)

У статті наведені різні точки зору на відмінність буржуазної революції від соціалістичної. Показано, що до будь-якої соціальної теорії, у тому числі і марксистської, не можна ставитися як до істини в останній інстанції,...

GLOBAL AND ANTIGLOBAL PROCESSES IN THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL DISCOURSE

Every epoch has its central discourse, which defines the various forms of life and becomes the motto of the entire human civilization. More than half a century the modern civilization being influenced by many unique and...

PHENOMENON OF INTELLIGENCE: PROBLEMS IN PHILOSOPHICAL INTERPRETATION

Formation of intelligence in each separate subject straightly depends on the social environment and social processes in society, historical development stage where it is, the experience of the individual, understanding t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP502223
  • DOI 10.5281/zenodo.57539
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Віталій Аркадійович ІГНАТЬЄВ (2016). RELIGIOUS SIMULACRUM – DANGER SYNCRETIC THINKING. Філософські обрії, 35(35), 184-191. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-502223