Research progress on catalytic oxidation technologies of gaseouselemental mercury in flue gases

Journal Title: Energy Environmental Protection - Year 2023, Vol 37, Issue 3

Abstract

Mercury catalytic oxidation technologies in recent studies are summarized in this study to highlight the present research development and future perspective of catalysts. The mercury oxidation catalysts are classified into V-based catalyst, noble metal catalyst and transition metal oxides catalyst. The mercury oxidation efficiency (MOE) of V-based catalyst strongly depends on HCl and Cl_2 concentrations in the flue gas. The noble metal catalyst (e.g., Au, Ag, Pt, Ru and Pd-based) is a promisingmercury oxidation catalyst because of its strong affinity toward mercury atom. The transition metal oxides (Cu, Mn, Fe, Mo, Ag, Pd, Cr, etc.) has also been used to develop low and middle temperature catalysts for Hg^0 oxidation. Most of these catalysts have very high mercury oxidation efficiencies at a certain temperature, but NH_3 and SO_2 in the flue gas seriously suppress the catalyst activity from 94.7%±3.9% and 83.9%±4.8% to 66.8%±16.8% and 57.1%±7.5%, respectively. It is concluded that puremetal oxides serving as single oxidation site would not be suitable mercury oxidation catalysts in the complex flue gas environment. The multicomponent metallic oxide catalysts generate more species oxidation reaction sites for NO reduction and Hg^0, which promotes the possibility of NO and Hg^0 synergic removal. This work also proposes the future challenge of highly efficient Hg0 oxidation catalyst.

Authors and Affiliations

LI Guoliang|School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China, YE Kaihang|School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China, GENG Mengda|School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China, ZHENG Yang|School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China, YUE Tao*|School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China

Keywords

Related Articles

Effects of intermittent power-on and electrode inversion on anaerobic co-digestion of sludge and food waste in MEC-CSTR system

The rapid urbanization has led to the discharge and generation of large amounts of organic solid waste, such as sewage sludge (SS) and food waste (FW). The introduction of a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) into the ana...

Research progress of resource utilization technologies for desulfurization wastewater in coal-fired power plants

The low-carbon resource utilization of desulfurization wastewater is the key to promoting zero liquid discharge of wastewater in the coal-fired power industry, realizing economic benefits and environmental protection. Ba...

CCUS policy research for carbon neutrality

The introduction of China′s "Dual Carbon" strategic goals has positioned Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology as the sole option for realizing the low-carbon utilization of fossil energy and as a cr...

Electrochemical upgrading of bio-oil: Effect of acetic acid and aromatic-rich fraction on coke formation

Bio-oil is the only liquid carbon-containing renewable resource. Due to its complex composition, low calorific value, high acidity, high viscosity, and other factors, it requires upgrading before further utilization. Ele...

Research progress of immobilized microbial technology in remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil

Soil remediation industry plays an important role in promoting "double carbon" action and improving soil carbon sink capacity. However, the concealment, persistence and irreversibility of heavy metal pollution make the s...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP737960
  • DOI 10.20078/j.eep.20230504
  • Views 52
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

LI Guoliang, YE Kaihang, GENG Mengda, ZHENG Yang, YUE Tao* (2023). Research progress on catalytic oxidation technologies of gaseouselemental mercury in flue gases. Energy Environmental Protection, 37(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-737960