Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

The history of judgment and decision making is defined by a trend toward increasingly nuanced explanations of the decision making process. Recently, process models have become incredibly sophisticated, yet the tools available to directly test these models have not kept pace. These increasingly complex process models require increasingly complex process data by which they can be adequately tested. We propose a new class of data collection that will facilitate evaluation of sophisticated process models. Tracking mouse paths during a continuous response provides an implicit measure of the growth of preference that produces a choice—rather than the current practice of recording just the button press that indicates that choice itself. Recent research in cognitive science (Spivey & Dale, 2006) has shown that cognitive processing can be revealed in these dynamic motor responses. Unlike current process methodologies, these response dynamics studies can demonstrate continuous competition between choice options and even online preference reversals. Here, in order to demonstrate the mechanics and utility of the methodology, we present an example response dynamics experiment utilizing a common multi-alternative decision task.

Authors and Affiliations

Gregory J. Koop and Joseph G. Johnson

Keywords

Related Articles

Now you see it now you don't: The effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks.

It has been proposed that recognition can form the basis of simple but ecologically rational decision strategies (Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996). Borges, Goldstein, Ortmann, & Gigerenzer (1999) found that constructing sha...

Are buyers of apartments superstitious? Evidence from the Russian real estate market

We study the influence of numerological superstitions on people’s buying behavior in the apartment market using unique actual sales data. Based on the dataset from Saint-Petersburg primary real estate market we compare t...

External validity of individual differences in multiple cue probability learning: The case of pilot training

Individuals differ in their ability to deal with unpredictable environments. Could impaired performances on learning an unpredictable cue-criteria relationship in a laboratory task be associated with impaired learning of...

Learning affects top down and bottom up modulation of eye movements in decision making

Repeated decision making is subject to changes over time such as decreases in decision time and information use and increases in decision accuracy. We show that a traditional strategy selection view of decision making ca...

Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do

Following up on a recent debate, we examined advice taking in dyads compared to individuals in a set of three studies (total N = 303 dyads and 194 individuals). Our first aim was to test the replicability of an important...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677859
  • DOI -
  • Views 132
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gregory J. Koop and Joseph G. Johnson (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677859