Response to “Mark Harris as a Naturalistic Theist” by Piotr Bylica
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2016, Vol 13, Issue
Abstract
In this paper, I respond to a recent published analysis of my work by Dr Piotr Bylica, which characterises me as a “naturalistic theist”. I suggest that Bylica’s analysis takes this approach in order to fit my thought into his own “levels of analysis” scheme, but that it does not accurately represent my own theistic beliefs. I further argue that this process has resulted in the loss of important nuances in my work on areas such as miracles, dualism, and biblical interpretation.
Authors and Affiliations
Mark Harris
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP182299
- DOI -
- Views 95
- Downloads 0
The Pretense of Doing Philosophy
Review of: Wojciech Grygiel, Stephena Hawkinga i Rogera Penrose’a spór o rzeczywistość, Copernicus Center Press, Kraków 2014, pp. 412.
The Classification of Creationist Positions
Author analyzes attempts of classifying the creationist positions present in the literature on this subject and then offers his own classification.
DNA and the Origin of Life: Information, Specification, and Explanation
This essay will evaluate competing explanations for the origin of the information necessary to build the first living cell. To do so will require determining what biologists have meant by the term information as it has b...
Romanes: Religion and Science
The article presents George John Romanes’ view on the relation between religion and science. Romanes was nineteenth century English evolutionary biologist interested also in theology. According to Romanes, the task of sc...
Nauki historyczne, nauki eksperymentalne i metoda naukowa
Wielu naukowców sądzi, że istnieje jedna, interdyscyplinarna metoda uprawiania dobrej nauki. Wzorcowe przykłady czerpane są jednak z obrębu klasycznych nauk eksperymentalnych. Czasem, kiedy hipotez o charakterze historyc...