Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 4

Abstract

Revealed preference is the dominant approach for inferring preferences, but it is limited in that it relies solely on discrete choice data. When a person chooses one alternative over another, we cannot infer the strength of their preference or predict how likely they will be to make the same choice again. However, the choice process also produces response times (RTs), which are continuous and easily observable. It has been shown that RTs often decrease with strength-of-preference. This is a basic property of sequential sampling models such as the drift diffusion model. What remains unclear is whether this relationship is sufficiently strong, relative to the other factors that affect RTs, to allow us to reliably infer strength-of-preference across individuals. Using several experiments, we show that even when every subject chooses the same alternative, we can still rank them based on their RTs and predict their behavior on other choice problems. We can also use RTs to predict whether a subject will repeat or reverse their decision when presented with the same choice problem a second time. Finally, as a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate that it is also possible to recover individual preference parameters from RTs alone. These results demonstrate that it is indeed possible to use RTs to infer preferences.

Authors and Affiliations

Arkady Konovalov and Ian Krajbich

Keywords

Related Articles

Hold on to it? An experimental analysis of the disposition effect

This paper experimentally investigates a well-known anomaly in portfolio management, i.e., the fact that paper losses are realized less than paper gains (disposition effect). I confirm the existence of the disposition ef...

Risky Decision Making: Testing for Violations of Transitivity Predicted by an Editing Mechanism

Transitivity is the assumption that if a person prefers A to B and B to C, then that person should prefer A to C. This article explores a paradigm in which Birnbaum, Patton and Lott (1999) thought people might be systema...

Reducing the impact bias in judgments of post-decisional affect: Distraction or task interference.?

People overestimate their affective reactions to future events and decisions — a phenomenon that has been termed “impact bias.” Evidence suggests that completing a diary detailing events contemporaneous with the focal on...

Perceptions of water systems

Public understanding of the water system is vital in confronting contemporary water challenges, as public support is necessary for implementing measures to address shortages and repair infrastructure. In this study, univ...

New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis.

Ninety-eight Australian students participated in a functional replication of a study published by Dijksterhuis et al. (2006). The results indicated that unconscious thought does not necessarily lead to better normative d...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678425
  • DOI -
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Arkady Konovalov and Ian Krajbich (2019). Revealed strength of preference: Inference from response times. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678425