When less is more in the recognition heuristic

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

The “less is more effect” (LIME) occurs when a recognition-dependent agent has a greater probability of choosing the better item than a more knowledgeable agent who recognizes more items. Goldstein and Gigerenzer (2002) define α as the probability that a correct choice is made on the basis of recognition alone and β the probability that a correct choice is made when both items are recognized (via additional cues). They claim that a LIME occurs if α > β (α > 1/2) and α and β remain constant as the number of recognized items, n, varies. In fact, it can be shown that neither of these parameters generally remains constant as n varies, and neither of them are simple functions of n. Therefore, a new theoretical basis for the LIME is needed. This paper provides mathematical results for understanding when the LIME can occur and elucidates implications of these results. The major findings presented here are as follows: Demonstrations that the LIME can occur when α ≤ β and fail to occur when α > β, and derivation of the conditions for these co-occurrences; A new characterization of the conditions under which the LIME occurs; Generalizations of this characterization to handle imperfect recognition; and Characterization of when the LIME occurs as more items become recognized. The primary implication of these results is that the advantage of the recognition cue depends not only on cue validities, but also on the order in which items are learned. This realization, in turn, suggests that research in this area should incorporate a more dynamic focus on learning and memory processes, and the effects of reputational information.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael Smithson

Keywords

Related Articles

Framing effects on bidding behavior in experimental first-price sealed-bid money auctions

Consumers often face prices that are the sum of two components, for example, an online purchase that includes a stated price and shipping costs. In such cases consumer behavior may be influenced by framing, i.e., how the...

Exploring the time-saving bias: How drivers misestimate time saved when increasing speed

According to the time-saving bias, drivers underestimate the time saved when increasing from a low speed and overestimate the time saved when increasing from a relatively high speed. Previous research used a specific typ...

Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?

Prior studies have found that subjects prefer an improving sequence of income over a constant sequence, even if the constant sequence offers a larger present-discounted value. However, little is known about how these pre...

Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health

This study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the General Decision-Making Scale (GDMS) on a sample of Slovak high-school and university students. Secondly, it addresses the relationship between decision-mak...

How bookies make your money

UK bookies (bookmakers) herd geographically in less-affluent areas. The present work shows that UK bookies also herd with the special bets that they advertise to consumers, both in their shop window advertising and on TV...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677741
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael Smithson (2010). When less is more in the recognition heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677741