Sample size and significance – somewhere between statistical power and judgment prostration
Journal Title: Archives of Medical Science - Year 2007, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
When performing scientific research we are so “embraced” to use the tool of inductive logic in our reasoning that we often express more generalized opinions on the population of interest based on relatively small sample(s) of a general population. What we take care about in such situations is that chosen segments are representative for a whole set of elements in the general population. To cope with such a demand we always want to know how large our selected subpopulation should be to enable us to detect the experimental effect of interest not only at a certain level of significance, but also with the highest possible power of statistical reasoning. Thus, when designing our experiment, we have to compromise between a sample size not too small to ensure that our sample is sufficiently representative, and not too large to benefit from the sampling procedure at all. The tools for the estimation of minimum required sample size and the analysis of power, which help us to make quick decisions on how to compromise reasonably between significance, statistical power and sample size, are discussed in this paper.
Authors and Affiliations
Cezary Watała
The estimation of clinical and home-based tilt training efficacy
Correlation between level of sodium/iodide symporter expression in tissue sections and some clinical parameters in patients with nodular goiter
Introduction: The aim of the study was to correlate the level of NIS expression in hot, warm and cold nodules with some clinical parameters such as TSH, FT3, FT4, TG, TPO-Ab, TG-Ab, TSH-R-Ab in serum samples, iodine in...
Impact of morbid obesity on pulmonary function
Penile erections Report from the Better Sex Summit, Athens, Greece
A practical method to determine the “atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype”