Selection of the Theory of the Preferable from among Mullā Ṣadrā’s Theories concerning Knowledge of the Materials and in the Materials
Journal Title: جستارهایی در فلسفه و کلام - Year 2014, Vol 46, Issue 92
Abstract
Mullā Ṣadrā has three different approaches towards knowledge by presence concerning the material existences. On many occasions, he regards the physical matters, including bodies and accidents, out of the realm of knowledge by presence and maintains that they are neither present with themselves nor with another reality and nor another reality can be present with them. On another basis, he maintains that the materials become known with their abstract cause. But, according to the third approach, on various other occasions he has maintained perception and consciousness for all creatures. In this viewpoint, he considers knowledge and existence as equal. Besides, according to him, presence is the precondition for knowledge and in fact the very reality of knowledge. Abstraction is the precondition for presence, as well. Therefore, it becomes necessary for the physical matters to have a kind of knowledge by presence and abstraction, too. Then, we can both speak of the hypothesis of the existence of the known (ma’lūm) with them and the hypothesis of their being set as known to the knowledge by presence. In this paper, we have tried, on the basis of the definitions and the principles that Mullā Ṣadrā has presented about knowledge, to distinguish between his positions in this respect and finally deal with the question as to which saying of Mullā Ṣadrā can be in a well-reasoned way considered as his ultimate and accurate view. According to the reasons presented at the end of the article, the third view and approach is preferred.
Authors and Affiliations
Elaheh Zare, Jahangir Masoodi
Cosmological Argument in the West
Cosmological argument has been one of the most significant philosophical and theological arguments in religious traditions of different religions. In the western Theo-philosophical tradition, there have been both differe...
A Critique of methodologism from the perspective of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics
Gadamer’s critique of methodologism is one of the fundamental teachings of his philosophical hermeneutics. Gadamer sees truth much beyond the ability of method to grasp it completely. He criticizes the exclusive restrict...
Social Classes in the Viewpoint of Khwāja Nasīr al-Dīn tūsī
Khwāja Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī is one of the greatest thinkers of the middle centuries (AH), who enjoys a high status in science and literature and has a worldwide reputation. Naṣīr al-Dīn Ṭūsī did not suffice himself merely w...
An Introduction to the Analyses and Approaches of the Muslim Thinkers to the Issue of Eternal Punishment of man in the Hereafter
The disputes of the believers in the eternality and non-eternality of punishment in the Qur’ānic and narrational evidences, lexical denotations, and rational approach, deserves deliberation. As such, the Qur’ānic evidenc...
Nūr al-Dīn Kāshānī and his Miṣafāt al-Ashbāḥ wa Mijalāt al-Arwāḥ
Attaining and understanding the truth will not be feasible except through mystical wayfaring, which would be possible only through assimilation into sharī‘a (religious law) and comprehension of its mysteries; the spiritu...