Single Layered Versus Double Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 6

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal anastomosis is one of the most common procedures being performed in oesophagogastric, hepatobiliary, bariatric, small bowel and colorectal surgery; however, the safety and efficacy of single layer or double layer anastomotic technique is still unclear. Aim: To assess and compare the efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of single layered versus double layered intestinal anastomosis. Materials and Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled comparative study comprised of patients who underwent intestinal resection and anastomosis. They were randomly assigned to undergo either single layered extra-mucosal anastomosis (Group-A) or double layered intestinal anastomosis (Group-B). Primary outcome measures included average time taken for anastomosis, postoperative complications, mean duration of hospital stay and cost of suture material used; secondary outcome measures assessed the postoperative return of bowel function. Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test and student t-test. Results: A total of 97 participants were randomized. Fifty patients were allocated to single layered extramucosal continuous anastomosis (Group-A) and 47 patients to double layered anastomosis (Group-B). The patients in each group were well matched for age, sex and diagnosis. The mean time taken for anastomosis (15.12±2.27 minutes in Group-A versus 24.38±2.26 minutes in Group-B) and the length of hospital stay (5.90±1.43 days in Group-A versus 7.29±1.89 days in Group-B) was significantly shorter in Group-A {p-value <0.001}. The postoperative return of bowel function was quicker in the single layer group (2.42±1.11 days) as compared to the double layer group (3.1±1.34 days). The cost of suture material used was relatively more in the single layered group (564 INR vs. 480 INR) which might be the only factor favoring a double layered anastomosis. However, there was no significant difference in the complication rates between the two groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that single layered extramucosal continuous intestinal anastomosis is equally safe and perhaps more cost effective than the conventional double layered method and may represent the optimal choice for routine surgical practice.

Authors and Affiliations

Sibabrata Kar, Vandana Mohapatra, Surendra Singh, Pratap Kumar Rath, Tapas Ranjan Behera

Keywords

Related Articles

Categorization and Management of Various Types of C-Shaped Canals: Two Case Reports

This case report presents the categorization and management of two cases of C-shaped canals in need of root canal treatment, based on the available classification systems. The prediction of C-shaped root canal morphology...

An In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Monolithic Zirconia after Surface Alteration Utilising Two Different Techniques

Introduction: Chairside surface alteration like grinding is often done by clinicians for adjustment of zirconia restorations. To restore the surface of the prostheses, either polishing or glazing is done. However, there...

The Effect of Soy Isoflavones on the Menopause Rating Scale Scoring in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Menopause is associated with many unpleasant symptoms which vary in different phases of menopausal transition. Although, Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is considered the most effective mode of treatment...

The Effect of Diabetes Mellitus Type I on Periodontal and Dental Status

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus type I is a chronic metabolic disease with an autoimmune origin. The initial manifestations mainly appear during childhood and its prevalence is on the rise in many countries. Some of the...

A Case of a Rapidly Enlarging Neck Mass with Airway Compromise

Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most lethal tumours in humans, extremely rare in occurrence and very aggressive in nature. We hereby present a rare case of ATC with airway compromise. A 66-year-old male,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP350165
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24817.9983
  • Views 76
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sibabrata Kar, Vandana Mohapatra, Surendra Singh, Pratap Kumar Rath, Tapas Ranjan Behera (2017). Single Layered Versus Double Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(6), 1-4. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-350165