So You Think You Are a Darwinian?
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2010, Vol 7, Issue 0
Abstract
Most educated people nowadays, I believe, think of themselves as Darwinians. If they do, however, it can only be from ignorance: from not knowing enough about what Darwinism says. For Darwinism says many things, especially about our species, which are too obviously false to be believed by any educated person; or at least by an educated person who retains any capacity at all for critical thought on the subject of Darwinism. Of course most educated people now are Darwinians, in the sense that they believe our species to have originated, not in a creative act of the Divine Will, but by evolution from other animals. But believing that proposition is not enough to make someone a Darwinian. It had been believed, as may be learnt from any history of biology, by very many people long before Darwinism, or Darwin, was born. What is needed to make someone an adherent of a certain school of thought is belief in all or most of the propositions which are peculiar to that school, and are believed either by all of its adherents, or at least by the more thoroughgoing ones. In any large school of thought, there is always a minority who adhere more exclusively than most to the characteristic beliefs of the school: they are the "purists" or "ultras" of that school. What is needed and sufficient, then, to make a person a Darwinian, is belief in all or most of the propositions which are peculiar to Darwinians, and believed either by all of them, or at least by ultra-Darwinians. I give ten propositions which are all Darwinian beliefs in the sense just specified. Each of them is obviously false: either a direct falsity about our species or, where the proposition is a general one, obviously false in the case of our species, at least.
Authors and Affiliations
David Stove
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP125256
- DOI -
- Views 88
- Downloads 0
Does Intelligent Design Theory Have Consequences Regarding the Existence of Supernatural Designer? A Polemic with Elliott Sober
A polemic with the article of Elliott Sober, ""Teoria inteligentnego projektu a nadnaturalizm: o tezie, że projektantem może być Bóg lub istoty pozaziemskie", [i]Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy[/i] 2007/2008, vol. 4/5, pp. 2...
Wokół problematyki genezy w Czekając na Godota Samuela Becketta
Szkic podejmuje problem genezy w Czekając na Godota Samuela Becketta. W pierwszej części ukazano genezę w sensie formalnym. Wymieniono w niej czynniki, które wpłynęły na powstanie tragikomedii. Są to: aspekt biograficzny...
A New Design Argument
Since the time of Darwin the concept of intelligent cause was eliminated from natural science. For scientific naturalists claimed that invoking such a cause contradicts the nature of science. Author argues, however, that...
Nienaturalistyczne metodologie we współczesnej praktyce
W niektórych dziedzinach istnieją już alternatywy dla naturalizmu metodologicznego. Jednakże niewiele osób spoza danej dziedziny zna te alternatywy lub wie, jak są wykorzystywane. Niekiedy nawet sami przedstawiciele tych...
The Place of Life and Man in Nature: Defending the Anthropocentric Thesis
Here I review the claim that the order of nature is uniquely suitable for life as it exists on earth (Terran life), and specifically for living beings similar to modern humans. I reassess Henderson’s claim from The Fitne...