SOCIALIST AND BOURGEOIS REVOLUTION: MARXISM AND PRESENTDAYS (CURRENT HISTORICAL RETROSPECTIVE)
Journal Title: Філософські обрії - Year 2015, Vol 0, Issue 34
Abstract
The article presents different points of view on the difference between the bourgeois revolution and socialist one. They claim that the fact that the socialist revolution is a violent break of natural historical evolution of capitalist society, the elimination of viable social order on the starting line of its progressive development. Unlike bourgeois revolution the socialist revolution broke social system which did not use its resources for self-development. If the bourgeois revolution is the result of gradual maturation of the capitalist system during centures then the socialist one is an ascending original act of creating of social order, which did not exist before. It is shown that any social theory, including the Marxist, can not be treated as the ultimate truth, because no social theory that existed in the past can be a guide to action in the present conditions that are rapidly and significantly changing . We need to stop considering Marxism as "ideology of modern condemporary time." Everybody gradually will learn how to be tolerant to a person with another point of view and treat him as otherwiseminded person not an enemy, but a partner only when pluralism will be accepted , even in the most extravagant cases, and the attitude will be merit, humanistic and cordial. No need to build our present and future on formulas of thousands of years history, it is worth stopping to hide behind the back of the class of Marxism, as well as to put all responsibility for our lifebeing. Main responsibility is not on them, but on us, those who are in authority. Great and good fortune of some will always result in great slavery for others.
Authors and Affiliations
Алла Петрівна КРАВЧЕНКО, Сергій Миколайович МОСКАЛЕНКО
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP502728
- DOI -
- Views 103
- Downloads 0
CHRISTIAN CONSERVATISM AND MASSOFIKATSIONNYE STRATEGY AND SIMULACRUM XX-XXI CENTURIES
The article examines the ideological and semantic universals Ukrainian, essentially Christocentric European resistance massofi katsionno-totalitarian ideological systems XX-XXI Art. We studied the experience of the latest...
EXISTENTIAL MEASURE OF LEADER` BECOMING: REVOLT AS A WAY TO CONSTRUCTIVE PROGRESSION OR TO ESCALATION OF VIOLENCE
In keeping with European intellectual tradition, there is a generally accepted point of view, positiong which personality is successful in terms of public confession achievement on condition of creative potential existen...
ГЛОБАЛІЗАЦІЯ ТА МУЛЬТИЛІНГВІЗМ – СУТНІСНІ ВЛАСТИВОСТІ СУЧАСНОГО ОСВІТНЬОГО ПОСТУПУ
Однією із суттєвих рис сучасного процесу глобалізації є по-ширення мультилінгвізму або двомовності. Ці якості відіграють значний вплив на нинішню освіту, адже, як наслідок, вона набу-ває мультилінгвального характеру. Рез...
WHAT IS THE NATIONAL PHILOSOPHY – THE IDEOLOGEME OR METAPHILOSOPHY CONCEPT?
One of the evidences of mainstreaming in Ukrainian philosophy discourse of the problem of philosophy national attribution has become the international discussion, recently initiated by Sententiae magazine. While analyzin...
Г. В. ЛЯЙБНІЦ: ВІД ДОВЕДЕННЯ ЛОГІЧНИХ ПРАВИЛ І СХЕМ ДО СИМВОЛІЧНОГО ЧИСЛЕННЯ ЛОГІКИ
У статті досліджується логічний доробок Г. В. Ляйбніца з точки зору встановлення взаємозв’язків логічного та матема-тичного знання у напрямку математизації логіки. Показано, що уведення до царини логіки математизованого...